The IRS issued guidelines on Sept. 9 that outline the conditions under which multiemployer plan sponsors can automatically revoke a funding status freeze requested under the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008.
The act, which offered relief for defined benefit funding affected by last year’s financial markets collapse, allowed the plans to freeze their funding status from Oct. 1, 2008, to Sept. 30, 2009.
For more information, see http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-il/2008-2009pgp.pdf.
A business coalition, including the U.S. Chamber and SHRM, has lost in its effort to have a court overturn the federal regulation requiring federal contractors to start using the E-Verify Program for federal contracts that are entered into or modified after September 8, 2009. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Maryland on August 26, 2009, turned down all arguments raised by the plaintiffs and has opened the door for the rule to be applicable as planned on September 8, 2009. There is no word on whether or not the decision will be appealed. The USCIS Web site has a federal contractor page as well as a series of Q&As on the rule that explains its provisions and application.
| Source http://www.irs.gov | ||
|
Source http://www.irs.gov
If you have not filed a prior year tax return and are due a refund, you should consider filing the return to claim that refund. If you are missing a refund for a previously filed tax return, you should contact the IRS to check the status of your refund and confirm your current address.
Unclaimed Refunds
Some people may have had taxes withheld from their wages but were not required to file a tax return because they had too little income. Others may not have had any tax withheld but would be eligible for the refundable Earned Income Tax Credit.
Undeliverable Refunds
Were you expecting a refund check but didn’t get it?
From IRS
New 2009 withholding tables issued to implement the Making Work Pay tax credit may leave some employees in an underwithheld position by year’s end. Learn how you can help employees prevent this via the IRS’s Withholding Calculator, which has been updated to reflect the impact of the MWP tax credit, and then file a new Form W-4. In particular, the following people may be affected:
On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Among many other provisions designed to encourage economic recovery, Title III of ARRA expands the federal Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) Continuation Coverage to provide a federal subsidy toward an eligible worker’s COBRA premium.
The Department of Labor has 30 days after the enactment of ARRA to issue model notices for use by employers.
A number of programs were included in the Act, which focus on providing tax relief to both individuals and businesses. Some of the more notable provisions are:
“Making Work Pay” Tax Credit
The Making Work Pay credit, which is available in 2009 and 2010, is worth up to $400 for an individual and $800 for spouses filing jointly. This credit begins to phase out for taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes in excess of $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for married couples filing jointly. This credit can either be claimed on tax returns or by reducing the amount of taxes that are withheld from paychecks.
“American Opportunity” Education Credit
This credit renames and expands the HOPE education credit. It allows a taxpayer to receive a credit of 100% for the first $2,000 in qualifying tuition and related expenses, and 25% for the second $2,000 of such expenses, for a maximum of $2,500. This credit is subject to a phase-out for individual taxpayers with an adjusted gross income in excess of $80,000 or $160,000 for married couples filing jointly.
Alternative Minimum Tax Patch
The Alternative Minimum Tax exemption is increased to $46,700 for individuals and $70,950 for married couples filing jointly, and allows personal credits against the Alternative Minimum Tax. This patch protects an estimated 26 million taxpayers from becoming subject to the AMT.
Above the Line Deduction for Automobiles
This is a new tax deduction for state and local sales tax paid on the purchase of new cars, from the effective date of the Act, February 17, 2009, through December 31, 2009. This deduction begins to phase out for taxpayers earning $125,000 per year for individuals and $250,000 for joint returns.
Extension of Bonus Depreciation
The bonus depreciation rules, which were set to expire after 2008, are extended for one year. The extended rule allows a 50% bonus depreciation for certain property placed in service by businesses in 2009, allowing businesses to deduct from their taxes 50% of the value of that property in addition to amounts that may otherwise be claimed under depreciation rules, after the item’s value is adjusted to account for the bonus depreciation.
Small Business Capital Gains
The law allows for a 75% exclusion for individuals on the gain from the sale of qualified stock held for more than five years. This applies to stock issued between February 17, 2009 and January 1, 2011. This exclusion is limited to individual investments and not the investments of a corporation.
Five-Year Carryback of Net Operating Losses
Businesses are allowed to “carryback” certain operating losses for up to five years, as opposed to the two year limitation previously allowed. Once a business opts to use the extended period, it becomes irrevocable.
Advanced Energy Investment Credit
A 30% investment tax credit is established for manufacturing advanced energy property, such as facilities that manufacture components for the production of renewable energy, energy conservation and other green technologies.
Non-Business & Residential Energy Property Credit
The tax credit for non-business energy property is increased to 30%. This credit may be claimed against expenses for certain energy-efficient improvements to existing homes, such as new furnaces, energy-efficient windows and doors, or insulation. To qualify, such expenses must occur in 2009.
New Markets Tax Credit
The dollars available for the New Markets Tax Credit increase to $5 billion for 2008 and 2009.
On January 29, 2009 President Obama signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. This act overrules the U. S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc. opening the door for employees file claims at a much later date than originally ruled.
This act raises many questions for employers that have yet to be addressed or answered. Let’s first talk about the areas of this law that we do know about. First, this law is retroactive to May 28, 2007 meaning that employees that have been, or may have been, discriminated against since this date can file a claim. Congress believed the previous decision unduly restricted the time period an employee had for filing pay discrimination claims.
Under Ledbetter an unlawful employment practice occurs when:
In short, what this means to employers is that each time an employee receives a wages, benefits or other compensation tainted by the discriminatory pay decision the deadline starts over.
Now, let’s talk about the questions that Ledbetter brings up. What records should a company examine and retain? How long should they be retained? Should they do a self audit?
Since this is a new law there are no court cases or rulings on any of these questions. However, initial analysis by most law firms says you should retain pertinent records indefinitely. Outside of the IRS regulations on record retention the only real guidance comes out of federal contracting regulations which require that all records be retained for a period of 2 years for companies with over 150 employees and 1 year for companies fewer than 150 employees. However, there is no evidence that these regulations will be used in governing Ledbetter.
With this in mind companies may consider conducting a self audit of their records. There are no provisions under Ledbetter where a company avoids penalties due to accidental, unintentional or uncovered violations. A violation is a violation.
Self audits would involve an examination of written policies relating to pay decisions in starting pay, promotional pay and merit pay increases. For companies without a formal pay structure this could particularly dangerous under Ledbetter since managers would have wide discretion in setting pay.