Welcome to HR Bits!

The landscape of HR and employment law is constantly changing. Staff One's professionals will
work to provide you with timely information on issues that matter. We welcome your comments.

This content, which was specially aggregated by Staff One, Inc., is not designed to render legal
advice or legal opinion. Such advice may be given only by a licensed, practicing attorney, and
only when related to actual fact situations. The material contained herein is intended to be
informational and not specific to a particular event or activity at a specific client worksite.

Tag: Human Resource

The High Cost of Non-Compliance

  • 70% of Employers are non-compliant with wage and hour laws, according to the Department of Labor (DOL).
  • 2 out of 3 workplace-related lawsuits that go to trial are won by the employee.
  • $10.3 Million: Civil penalties assessed against employers by the Wage &  Hour Division of the DOL in 2007.
  • $220.6 Million:  Damages paid by employers for wage and hour non compliance in 2007.
  • 11.2 Million:  The jury award against Mary Kay Cosmetics for classifying beauty “consultants” as independent contractors.
  • $650,000:  The average jury award to plaintiffs for damages in workplace-related lawsuits.
  • 88,846:  Number of violations recorded by OSHA inspectors in 2007, of which 67,176 were serious.
  • $1 million: Potential per-occurrence fine for failure to safeguard personal/non-public information against identity theft under the Gramm/Leach/Bliley safeguard Bill.

With the unemployment rate at more than 9%, talk of layoffs, and the closing of numerous businesses, it’s easy to see why many organizations are tightening their reins.  However, it is important to maintain, or create, an atmosphere of security, flexibility, and contentment for employees especially during an economic crisis.  The temptation may be to put more emphasis on the bottom line than on those that create the bottom line.  This could create more cost than you think.  For example, turnover rates for 2008 (both voluntary and involuntary) averaged 18.7%.  According to Watson Wyatt, total turnover costs including hard dollars and lost productivity are approximately 48% – 61% of salary.  If a company has 60 employees with an average salary of $40,000, that could mean a cost of $215,424 to $273,768!

So how does an employer stay competitive without spending a lot of money?  There are several things employers can do that cost little, but can go a long way in eye of an employee.

1.       Communicate.

Communication creates a sense of security for an employee.  Not only communication about operations and product offerings, but culturally and structurally as well.  If people feel that they have a good understanding of where the company is going and how it is going to get there, they are generally more connected and invested in it.  Communication creates a purpose and meaning to come and work every day.

2.       Be flexible.

Increasing flex-time or being more flexible with work schedules is a great way to add value in the eye of the employee.  Being aware of the scheduling needs of employees and then trying to meet those needs creates a loyalty and appreciation to your company.

3.       Recognition and Rewards.

Recognizing a job well done or rewarding employees that have just finished a project shows that they are appreciated for their efforts and it is noticed.  Rewards could be anything from an extra vacation day or a gift card to a restaurant.  They don’t have to cost a lot to have a significant impact.

These are just a few ways employers can keep their employees productive, content, and loyal through wage freezes or layoffs.  Eventually the economy will turn and the last thing an employer needs to worry about when this happens is finding good employees.  Remember, investing in the your human capital doesn’t have to cost much, but will pay huge dividends in the future.

One aspect of the recently approved federal stimulus bill – the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -offers eligible terminated employees a 65 percent discount on COBRA coverage.  Enacted in 1986, COBRA allows former employees to continue their health insurance coverage for up to 18 months after they are terminated.

 The issue facing business owners is that they must pay 65 percent of the COBRA premium and then file for reimbursement through a payroll tax credit.  Employees pay the other 35 percent.  This discounted rate could potentially cause a dramatic increase in COBRA election by former employees.

 To avoid substantial penalties, employers were required to mail out COBRA notices by April 18, 2009 to eligible employees who had been laid off since September 1, 2008.  This new regulation affects most companies with 20 or more employees.

Some companies are worried that the federal requirement could cause cash flow problems because of the up-to-three-month delay for reimbursement.  And cash flow problems could cause some financially strapped companies to lay off more employees, freeze or cut salaries, or eliminate some benefits.

How the new COBRA rules work:

  • The federal government will provide a 65 percent subsidy for up to nine months of the COBRA premium retroactive to March 1 for certain terminated employees.
  • To be entitled to the subsidy, employees must have been involuntarily terminated between September 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, and must be eligible for COBRA.
  • A special election period exists for individuals involuntarily terminated on or after last September 1 who had not elected COBRA.  They will have 60 more days after receiving the notice to elect coverage, which is retroactive to March 1 if they lost their jobs before then.
  • The employer pays the 65 percent on the employee’s behalf and is then reimbursed through a payroll tax credit.  Large companies may be reimbursed either weekly or monthly, but smaller employers must file for the credit with their quarterly payroll taxes.
  • The employee must pay 35 percent of COBRA before the employer can request reimbursement of the other 65 percent.  Employers that do not charge the full COBRA premium will not be entitled to reimbursement of 65 percent of the maximum COBRA premium.

 For more information, visit www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-09-27.pdf or www.dol.gov/ebsa/cobra.html

Staff One and our Client Companies are at-will employers in all states where applicable. This means that, in the absence of a union contract or other employment contract limiting an employer’s right to discharge or stating a specific term or duration of employment, the employer is free to hire and fire at any time for any reason – or for no reason at all. However, court decisions and new statutes in recent years have created a more complex employment situation.

Federal and state laws may limit what can be considered in making an employment decision. You cannot base an employment decision on race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, veterans’ status, filing a workers’ compensation claim, use of benefit plans, serving on a jury, etc.

Courts have also expanded potential liability for employers who discharge employees in violation of “Public Policy” reasons.  For example, if an employee accuses his employer of firing him for refusing to carry out some unlawful request or claims he was fired for reporting allegedly unlawful acts on the part of his employer, that person could be considered as a “whistleblower” and can bring a wrongful discharge lawsuit.

While employment lawsuits arise out of all sorts of circumstances, the event which causes most legal actions is a discharge or termination of employment. Therefore, we must be increasingly sensitive to what can and cannot be done in connection with a termination. The manner in which a termination is handled is critical.

Successful supervisors avoid having to discipline employees by treating them in a fair and reasonable way. Once employees understand what is expected of them, they will usually do their jobs effectively. Do not be afraid to ask for the kind of action you expect from individuals. How else will they know?

Progressive Discipline System

If discipline becomes necessary, Staff One advocates a progressive discipline system to deal with problem employees and minimize the possibility of wrongful discharge and discrimination claims.  The system basically imposes goals, timetables, and progressively greater disciplinary measures upon an employee whose performance continues to be unacceptable. The system also recognizes that certain infractions or misconduct will be sufficient for immediate discharge. It is absolutely mandatory that this system be used uniformly with all employees.

 Below are the steps to an effective progressive discipline system.

Step 1: Verbal Warning

A verbal warning is usually adequate for a first offense. Be sure to discuss the problem in private with the employee, explaining what was done wrong and what will happen if another violation occurs. Be sure to document the warning in writing, and send a record of the conversation to Staff One to be placed in the employee’s personnel file.

Step 2: Written Warning

If after receiving a verbal warning the offense is repeated, a written warning should be used.

Review the facts of the case with the employee and in the presence of another supervisor at your level or above. Tell the employee what action will be considered if another violation occurs. A limit should be set on the number of written warnings allowed before other action is taken. Make a record of the meeting, stating the facts that were reviewed with the employee and the action taken (use Staff One’s Employee Written Warning Notice). Have the employee sign the notice, after allowing him or her to enter comments. If the employee refuses to sign, have the supervisor sign the notice attesting to the employee’s refusal. Send the warning to Staff One to be placed in the employee’s personnel file.

Step 3: Suspension

A suspension without pay may be considered for employees as deemed necessary. Contact your Staff One Client Service Executive or Staff One’s Corporate HR Department for guidance.

Step 4: Discharge

Terminating an employee can present a difficult and sometimes hazardous situation. A recent nationwide survey showed that half of all companies that fired anyone had a suit or legal charge brought against them. You can help minimize this risk by considering the effects of any termination. It is always unpleasant to terminate an employee, but try to carry out the termination in a rational manner, not out of anger and never on the spur of the moment.

Call Staff One Client Services Department or your Client Service Executive before proceeding with any termination action. Together, we will discuss your plan and the reason(s) for the termination.

Many times, you may overlook the “protected activities” an employee might say are the real reasons for the termination. For instance, has the employee recently filed a workers’ compensation claim (a “protected activity”)?

Termination Meetings

This is a crucial step in the process. Terminating an employee is never easy, and the very fact that it is such an uncomfortable situation may cause you to be nervous or make a mistake. So, before you terminate an employee, contact your Staff One Client Service Executive or Staff One’s Corporate HR Department for guidance.

DALLAS, TX. (March 26, 2009) – Staff One, Inc., a leading provider of HR Outsourcing solutions, today announced a new program that will help small and medium-sized companies optimize their Human Resources costs, stay current with new employment laws and gain access to benefits typically enjoyed by much larger companies.

The Staff One HR Outsourcing Business Stimulus Program is designed for businesses with fewer than 750 employees. Participants in the program will receive a wide array of HR services that are typically only available to FORTUNE 500 companies.

For additional details on the program, companies can visit www.staffone.com/stimulus. To qualify for the program, companies must contact Staff One prior to April 15, 2009 and become a client by June 1, 2009. Existing clients are not eligible for the program.

To read the full press release, click here.

The New FMLA

Effective January 16, 2009, the new FMLA rules will have an impact on companies in PEO relationships. In addition to other changes, these rules make FMLA compliance optional to employer with less than 50 employees.  At a high level, the new rules require that HR professionals master 10 key changes to the regulation:

  • Military caregiver leave: Implements the requirement to expand FMLA protections for family members caring for a covered service member with a serious injury or illness incurred while on active duty. These family members are able to take up to 26 workweeks of leave in a 12-month period.
  • Leave for “qualifying exigencies” for families of National Guard and Reserve members: The law allows families of National Guard and Reserve personnel on active duty to take FMLA job-protected leave to manage their affairs – “qualifying exigencies.” The rules define “qualifying exigencies” as situations involving: 1) short-notice deployment, 2) military events and related activities, 3) childcare and school activities, 4) financial and legal arrangements, 5) counseling, 6) rest and recuperation, 7) post-deployment activities and 8 ) additional activities where the employer and employee agree to the leave.
  • New employer notice obligations: The final rules consolidate all employer notice requirements into a “one-stop” section of the regulations to clear up some conflicting provisions and time periods. Further, they clarify and strengthen employer notice requirements so employers can better inform employees about their FMLA rights and obligations, and allow for a smoother exchange of information between employers and employees.
  • New employee notice rights: The final rules modify the current provision that had been interpreted to allow some employees to notify their employers of their need for FMLA leave up to two full business days after an absence, even if they could provide notice sooner. Under the final rules, the employee must follow the employer’s normal and customary call-in procedures, unless there are unusual circumstances.
  • New medical certification process: The final rules recognize the advent of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the applicability of HIPAA’s medical privacy rule to communications between employers and employees’ health care providers. Responding to concerns about medical privacy, the rules add a requirement that limits who may contact the health care provider and bans an employee’s direct supervisor from making the contact.
  • Clarification of waivers of rights: The DOL has finalized its longstanding position that employees may voluntarily settle their FMLA claims without court or departmental approval. However, prospective waivers of FMLA rights will continue to be prohibited.
  • Definition of “serious health condition”: While the rules retain individual definitions of “serious health condition,” they add guidance on some regulatory matters. If an employee is taking leave involving more than three consecutive calendar days of incapacity plus two visits to a health care provider, the two visits must occur within 30 days of the period of incapacity. The rules define “periodic visits to a health care provider” for chronic serious health conditions as at least two visits to a health care provider per year.
  • Clarification of light-duty FMLA rules: At least two courts have held that an employee uses up his or her 12-week FMLA leave while on a “light-duty” assignment. Under the final rules, time spent in light-duty work does not count against an employee’s FMLA leave entitlement, and the employee’s right to job restoration is held in abeyance during the light-duty period. If an employee is voluntarily doing light-duty work, he or she is not on FMLA leave.
  • Application of FMLA leave to awarding perfect attendance awards: The final rules change how perfect attendance awards are treated to allow employers to deny a “perfect attendance” award to an employee who does not have perfect attendance because he or she took FMLA leave-but only if the employer treats employees taking non-FMLA leave in an identical way.
  • Clarification of “leave stacking” rules: The updated rule contains technical changes to be consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide Inc. The court ruled that the regulation’s so-called “categorical” penalty (requiring an employer to provide 12 additional weeks of FMLA-protected leave after the employee had already taken 30 weeks of leave ) was inconsistent with the statutory limit of only 12 weeks of FMLA leave and contrary to the law’s remedial requirement that an employee demonstrate individual harm. The new rule removes these penalties and clarifies that if an employee suffers individual harm because the employer did not follow the notification rules, the employer may be liable.

The new employer notice obligation will be the most critical to follow.  There are new FMLA forms and deadlines for the notification.

About

Founded in 1988, Staff One is a leading Human Resources Outsourcing firm with an ESAC accredited and bonded PEO service offering. Staff One operates as a full-service human resources department and delivers a comprehensive range of solutions that provides our clients with a level of support and value previously only available at much larger companies. By aggregating the buying power of hundreds of firms, we provide premium benefits, risk management, compliance management, payroll outsourcing, tax administration and strategic HR services to our customers, so they can focus on growing their core business. For more information, visit www.staffone.com