DALLAS, TX. (March 26, 2009) – Staff One, Inc., a leading provider of HR Outsourcing solutions, today announced a new program that will help small and medium-sized companies optimize their Human Resources costs, stay current with new employment laws and gain access to benefits typically enjoyed by much larger companies.

The Staff One HR Outsourcing Business Stimulus Program is designed for businesses with fewer than 750 employees. Participants in the program will receive a wide array of HR services that are typically only available to FORTUNE 500 companies.

For additional details on the program, companies can visit www.staffone.com/stimulus. To qualify for the program, companies must contact Staff One prior to April 15, 2009 and become a client by June 1, 2009. Existing clients are not eligible for the program.

To read the full press release, click here.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has submitted to the Federal Register an interim final rule that revises the list of documents acceptable for the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, process. The revised form will improve the security of the employment authorization verification process.  Your company will be required to use the revised form for all new hires and to re-verify any employee with expiring employment authorization beginning on April 3, 2009.

The revised Form I-9 reflects changes made to the list of documents acceptable for Form I-9 in accordance with the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) recent interim final rule. The rule furthers DHS’s ongoing effort to increase the security of the employment authorization verification process.

What is the difference between the revised Form I-9 and the old one?

The biggest difference in the revised Form I-9 is that all documents presented during the verification process must be unexpired. Other than several technical updates, the following documents have been added or removed:

Two documents have been added to List A (Documents that Establish Both Identity and Employment Authorization) on the List of Acceptable Documents:

• A temporary I-551 printed notation on a machine-readable immigrant visa in addition to the foreign passport with a temporary I-551 stamp; and
• A passport from the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) or the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) with a valid Form I-94 or Form I-94A indicating nonimmigrant admission under the Compact of Free Association Between the United States and the FSM or RMI.

Three documents were removed from List A of the List of Acceptable Documents:

• Form I-688, Temporary Resident Card;
• Form I-688A, Employment Authorization Card; and
• Form I-688B, Employment Authorization Card.

Beginning April 3, 2009, your company may only accept documents listed on the List of Acceptable Documents on the revised Form I-9. When an employee must be re-verified because his or her employment authorization has expired, you should ensure that they use the revised Form I-9 with its new List of Acceptable Documents. You cannot re-verify the employee by completing Section 3 – Updating and Re-verification on a previous version of the Form I-9.

The current edition of Form I-9, dated 06/05/2007, will no longer be valid for use on or after April 3, 2009.  Employers who continue to use the 06/05/2007 edition of Form I-9 on or after that date may be subject to civil money penalties.

The revised I-9 will be available on the Staff One online forms repository beginning on April 3, 2009.

For more details on employment eligibility verification, you can visit the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website at www.uscis.gov.

Effective January 16, 2009, the new FMLA rules will have an impact on companies in PEO relationships. In addition to other changes, these rules make FMLA compliance optional to employer with less than 50 employees.  At a high level, the new rules require that HR professionals master 10 key changes to the regulation:

• Military caregiver leave: Implements the requirement to expand FMLA protections for family members caring for a covered service member with a serious injury or illness incurred while on active duty. These family members are able to take up to 26 workweeks of leave in a 12-month period.
• Leave for “qualifying exigencies” for families of National Guard and Reserve members: The law allows families of National Guard and Reserve personnel on active duty to take FMLA job-protected leave to manage their affairs – “qualifying exigencies.” The rules define “qualifying exigencies” as situations involving: 1) short-notice deployment, 2) military events and related activities, 3) childcare and school activities, 4) financial and legal arrangements, 5) counseling, 6) rest and recuperation, 7) post-deployment activities and 8 ) additional activities where the employer and employee agree to the leave.
• New employer notice obligations: The final rules consolidate all employer notice requirements into a “one-stop” section of the regulations to clear up some conflicting provisions and time periods. Further, they clarify and strengthen employer notice requirements so employers can better inform employees about their FMLA rights and obligations, and allow for a smoother exchange of information between employers and employees.
• New employee notice rights: The final rules modify the current provision that had been interpreted to allow some employees to notify their employers of their need for FMLA leave up to two full business days after an absence, even if they could provide notice sooner. Under the final rules, the employee must follow the employer’s normal and customary call-in procedures, unless there are unusual circumstances.
• New medical certification process: The final rules recognize the advent of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the applicability of HIPAA’s medical privacy rule to communications between employers and employees’ health care providers. Responding to concerns about medical privacy, the rules add a requirement that limits who may contact the health care provider and bans an employee’s direct supervisor from making the contact.
• Clarification of waivers of rights: The DOL has finalized its longstanding position that employees may voluntarily settle their FMLA claims without court or departmental approval. However, prospective waivers of FMLA rights will continue to be prohibited.
• Definition of “serious health condition”: While the rules retain individual definitions of “serious health condition,” they add guidance on some regulatory matters. If an employee is taking leave involving more than three consecutive calendar days of incapacity plus two visits to a health care provider, the two visits must occur within 30 days of the period of incapacity. The rules define “periodic visits to a health care provider” for chronic serious health conditions as at least two visits to a health care provider per year.
• Clarification of light-duty FMLA rules: At least two courts have held that an employee uses up his or her 12-week FMLA leave while on a “light-duty” assignment. Under the final rules, time spent in light-duty work does not count against an employee’s FMLA leave entitlement, and the employee’s right to job restoration is held in abeyance during the light-duty period. If an employee is voluntarily doing light-duty work, he or she is not on FMLA leave.
• Application of FMLA leave to awarding perfect attendance awards: The final rules change how perfect attendance awards are treated to allow employers to deny a “perfect attendance” award to an employee who does not have perfect attendance because he or she took FMLA leave-but only if the employer treats employees taking non-FMLA leave in an identical way.
• Clarification of “leave stacking” rules: The updated rule contains technical changes to be consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide Inc. The court ruled that the regulation’s so-called “categorical” penalty (requiring an employer to provide 12 additional weeks of FMLA-protected leave after the employee had already taken 30 weeks of leave ) was inconsistent with the statutory limit of only 12 weeks of FMLA leave and contrary to the law’s remedial requirement that an employee demonstrate individual harm. The new rule removes these penalties and clarifies that if an employee suffers individual harm because the employer did not follow the notification rules, the employer may be liable.

The new employer notice obligation will be the most critical to follow.  There are new FMLA forms and deadlines for the notification.

By SHRM Online staff
Officials with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) have delayed until April 3, 2009, a requirement that employers must use a revised version of the employment eligibility verification form–known as the I-9 form. According to an interim rule published in December 2008, employers were supposed to begin using the revised verification form on Feb. 2, 2009. However, when President Obama took office, the White House issued a directive to all federal agencies asking them to review any regulations introduced by the Bush administration that had not taken effect before Jan. 20, 2009.

USCIS officials stated that the 60-day delay should provide adequate time to complete a full review of the new form and employment verification requirements. A notice announcing the delay was set to appear in the Federal Register. In addition, the USCIS will reopen the public comment period on the new rule for 30 days, until March 4, 2009. Employers must complete a Form I-9 for all newly hired employees to verify their identity and authorization to work in the United States. The interim final rule as published would have revised the types of acceptable identity and employment authorization documents employers can accept from new hires.

Founded in 1988, Staff One is a leading Human Resources Outsourcing firm with an ESAC accredited and bonded PEO service offering. Staff One operates as a full-service human resources department and delivers a comprehensive range of solutions that provides our clients with a level of support and value previously only available at much larger companies. By aggregating the buying power of hundreds of firms, we provide premium benefits, risk management, compliance management, payroll outsourcing, tax administration and strategic HR services to our customers, so they can focus on growing their core business. For more information, visit www.staffone.com

On January 29, 2009 President Obama signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.  This act overrules the U. S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc. opening the door for employees file claims at a much later date than originally ruled.

 This act raises many questions for employers that have yet to be addressed or answered.  Let’s first talk about the areas of this law that we do know about.  First, this law is retroactive to May 28, 2007 meaning that employees that have been, or may have been, discriminated against since this date can file a claim.  Congress believed the previous decision unduly restricted the time period an employee had for filing pay discrimination claims.

 Under Ledbetter an unlawful employment practice occurs when:

• The discriminatory pay decision is made
• An individual becomes subject to the discriminatory pay decision, or
• An individual is affected by the discriminatory compensation decision or other practice.

In short, what this means to employers is that each time an employee receives a wages, benefits or other compensation tainted by the discriminatory pay decision the deadline starts over.

Now, let’s talk about the questions that Ledbetter brings up.  What records should a company examine and retain?  How long should they be retained?  Should they do a self audit?

Since this is a new law there are no court cases or rulings on any of these questions.  However, initial analysis by most law firms says you should retain pertinent records indefinitely.  Outside of the IRS regulations on record retention the only real guidance comes out of federal contracting regulations which require that all records be retained for a period of 2 years for companies with over 150 employees and 1 year for companies fewer than 150 employees.  However, there is no evidence that these regulations will be used in governing Ledbetter.

With this in mind companies may consider conducting a self audit of their records.  There are no provisions under Ledbetter where a company avoids penalties due to accidental, unintentional or uncovered violations.  A violation is a violation.

Self audits would involve an examination of written policies relating to pay decisions in starting pay, promotional pay and merit pay increases.  For companies without a formal pay structure this could particularly dangerous under Ledbetter since managers would have wide discretion in setting pay.