<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR Bits &#187; HRO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrbits.com/tag/hro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrbits.com</link>
	<description>Produced by Staff One, Inc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The High Cost of Non-Compliance</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2010/01/21/the-high-cost-of-non-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2010/01/21/the-high-cost-of-non-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[70% of Employers are non-compliant with wage and hour laws, according to the Department of Labor (DOL). 2 out of 3 workplace-related lawsuits that go to trial are won by the employee. $10.3 Million: Civil penalties assessed against employers by the Wage &#38;  Hour Division of the DOL in 2007. $220.6 Million:  Damages paid by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>70% of Employers are non-compliant with wage and hour laws, according to the Department of Labor (DOL).</li>
<li>2 out of 3 workplace-related lawsuits that go to trial are won by the employee.</li>
<li>$10.3 Million: Civil penalties assessed against employers by the Wage &amp;  Hour Division of the DOL in 2007.</li>
<li>$220.6 Million:  Damages paid by employers for wage and hour non compliance in 2007.</li>
<li>11.2 Million:  The jury award against Mary Kay Cosmetics for classifying beauty &#8220;consultants&#8221; as independent contractors.</li>
<li>$650,000:  The average jury award to plaintiffs for damages in workplace-related lawsuits.</li>
<li>88,846:  Number of violations recorded by OSHA inspectors in 2007, of which 67,176 were serious.</li>
<li>$1 million: Potential per-occurrence fine for failure to safeguard personal/non-public information against identity theft under the Gramm/Leach/Bliley safeguard Bill.</li>
</ul>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2010%2F01%2F21%2Fthe-high-cost-of-non-compliance%2F&amp;title=The%20High%20Cost%20of%20Non-Compliance">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2010/01/21/the-high-cost-of-non-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expiration Date of Employment Eligibility Verification Form I-9 Extended to Aug. 31, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/09/02/expiration-date-of-employment-eligibility-verification-form-i-9-extended-to-aug-31-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/09/02/expiration-date-of-employment-eligibility-verification-form-i-9-extended-to-aug-31-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From USCIS On August 27th, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the Office of Management and Budget has extended its approval of Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) to Aug. 31, 2012. Consequently, USCIS has amended the form to reflect a new revision date of Aug. 7, 2009. Employers may use the Form I-9 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From USCIS</em></p>
<p>On August 27th, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the Office of Management and Budget has extended its approval of Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) to Aug. 31, 2012. Consequently, USCIS has amended the form to reflect a new revision date of Aug. 7, 2009.</p>
<p>Employers may use the Form I-9 with the revision date of either Aug. 7, 2009 or Feb. 2, 2009. The revision dates are located on the bottom right-hand portion of the form.</p>
<p>Staff One clients should begin using the revised I-9 form for all new hires, effective immediately.  The new form can be found at <a href="http://www.staffone.com" target="_blank">www.staffone.com</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F09%2F02%2Fexpiration-date-of-employment-eligibility-verification-form-i-9-extended-to-aug-31-2012%2F&amp;title=Expiration%20Date%20of%20Employment%20Eligibility%20Verification%20Form%20I-9%20Extended%20to%20Aug.%2031%2C%202012">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/09/02/expiration-date-of-employment-eligibility-verification-form-i-9-extended-to-aug-31-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Contractors Must Use E-Verify Starting September 8, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/federal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/federal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A business coalition, including the U.S. Chamber and SHRM, has lost in its effort to have a court overturn the federal regulation requiring federal contractors to start using the E-Verify Program for federal contracts that are entered into or modified after September 8, 2009. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Maryland on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A business coalition, including the U.S. Chamber and SHRM, has lost in its effort to have a court overturn the federal regulation requiring federal contractors to start using the E-Verify Program for federal contracts that are entered into or modified after September 8, 2009.  The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Maryland on August 26, 2009, turned down all arguments raised by the plaintiffs and has opened the door for the rule to be applicable as planned on September 8, 2009. There is no word on whether or not the decision will be appealed.  The USCIS Web site has a <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=534bbd181e09d110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&#038;vgnextchannel=534bbd181e09d110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD">federal contractor page</a> as well as a <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=cb2a535e0869d110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&#038;vgnextchannel=534bbd181e09d110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD">series of Q&#038;As </a>on the rule that explains its provisions and application.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F08%2F27%2Ffederal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009%2F&amp;title=Federal%20Contractors%20Must%20Use%20E-Verify%20Starting%20September%208%2C%202009">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/federal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee vs. Independent Contractor – Ten Tips for Business Owners</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/employee-vs-independent-contractor-%e2%80%93-ten-tips-for-business-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/employee-vs-independent-contractor-%e2%80%93-ten-tips-for-business-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source http://www.irs.gov  IRS Summertime Tax Tip 2009-20 If you are a small business owner, whether you hire people as independent contractors or as employees will impact how much taxes you pay and the amount of taxes you withhold from their paychecks. Additionally, it will affect how much additional cost your business must bear, what documents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="98%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="content"><i>Source <a href="http://www.irs.gov">http://www.irs.gov</a></i> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<table border="0" width="auto">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>IRS Summertime Tax Tip 2009-20<br />
If you are a small business owner, whether you hire people as independent contractors or as employees will impact how much taxes you pay and the amount of taxes you withhold from their paychecks. Additionally, it will affect how much additional cost your business must bear, what documents and information they must provide to you, and what tax documents you must give to them.Here are the top ten things every business owner should know about hiring people as independent contractors versus hiring them as employees.1. Three characteristics are used by the IRS to determine the relationship between businesses and workers: Behavioral Control, Financial Control, and the Type of Relationship. </p>
<p>2. Behavioral Control covers facts that show whether the business has a right to direct or control how the work is done through instructions, training or other means. </p>
<p>3. Financial Control covers facts that show whether the business has a right to direct or control the financial and business aspects of the worker&#8217;s job. </p>
<p>4. The Type of Relationship factor relates to how the workers and the business owner perceive their relationship.</p>
<p>5. If you have the right to control or direct not only what is to be done, but also how it is to be done, then your workers are most likely employees.</p>
<p>6. If you can direct or control only the result of the work done &#8212; and not the means and methods of accomplishing the result &#8212; then your workers are probably independent contractors. </p>
<p>7. Employers who misclassify workers as independent contractors can end up with substantial tax bills. Additionally, they can face penalties for failing to pay employment taxes and for failing to file required tax forms. </p>
<p>8. Workers can avoid higher tax bills and lost benefits if they know their proper status.</p>
<p>9. Both employers and workers can ask the IRS to make a determination on whether a specific individual is an independent contractor or an employee by filing a Form SS-8 – Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding – with the IRS.</p>
<p>10. You can learn more about the critical determination of a worker’s status as an Independent Contractor or Employee at IRS.gov by selecting the Small Business link.  Additional resources include IRS Publication 15-A, Employer&#8217;s Supplemental Tax Guide, Publication 1779, Independent Contractor or Employee, and Publication 1976, Do You Qualify for Relief under Section 530? These publications and Form SS-8 are available on the IRS Web site or by calling the IRS at 800-829-3676 (800-TAX-FORM).</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div><a href="http://www.hrbits.com/businesses/small/article/0,,id=99921,00.html">Contractor vs. Employee</a></div>
</li>
<li>
<div><a href="http://www.hrbits.com/pub/irs-pdf/p1779.pdf">Publication 1779 </a></div>
</li>
<li>
<div><a href="http://www.hrbits.com/pub/irs-pdf/p15.pdf">Publication 15-A</a>  </div>
</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td width="5"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F08%2F27%2Femployee-vs-independent-contractor-%25e2%2580%2593-ten-tips-for-business-owners%2F&amp;title=Employee%20vs.%20Independent%20Contractor%20%E2%80%93%20Ten%20Tips%20for%20Business%20Owners">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/employee-vs-independent-contractor-%e2%80%93-ten-tips-for-business-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the IRS Owe You Money?</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/13/does-the-irs-owe-you-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/13/does-the-irs-owe-you-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source http://www.irs.gov If you have not filed a prior year tax return and are due a refund, you should consider filing the return to claim that refund. If you are missing a refund for a previously filed tax return, you should contact the IRS to check the status of your refund and confirm your current [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Source <a href="http://www.irs.gov" target="_blank">http://www.irs.gov</a> </em></p>
<p>If you have not filed a prior year tax return and are due a refund, you should consider filing the return to claim that refund. If you are missing a refund for a previously filed tax return, you should contact the IRS to check the status of your refund and confirm your current address.</p>
<p><strong>Unclaimed Refunds</strong></p>
<p>Some people may have had taxes withheld from their wages but were not required to file a tax return because they had too little income. Others may not have had any tax withheld but would be eligible for the refundable Earned Income Tax Credit.</p>
<ul>
<li>To collect this money a return must be filed with the IRS no later than three years from the due date of the return.</li>
<li>If no return is filed to claim the refund within three years, the money becomes the property of the U.S. Treasury.</li>
<li>There is no penalty assessed by the IRS for filing a late return qualifying for a refund.</li>
<li>Current and prior year tax forms and instructions are available on the Forms and Publications web page of IRS.gov or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).</li>
<li>Information about the Earned Income Tax Credit and how to claim it is also available on IRS.gov.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Undeliverable Refunds</strong></p>
<p>Were you expecting a refund check but didn&#8217;t get it?</p>
<ul>
<li>Refund checks are mailed to your last known address. Checks are returned to the IRS if you move without notifying the IRS or the U.S. Postal Service.</li>
<li>You may be able to update your address with the IRS on the &#8220;Where&#8217;s My Refund?&#8221; feature available on IRS.gov. You will be prompted to provide an updated address if there is an undeliverable check outstanding within the last 12 months.</li>
<li>You can also ensure the IRS has your correct address by filing Form 8822, Change of Address, which is available on IRS.gov or can be ordered by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).</li>
<li>If you do not have access to the Internet and think you may be missing a refund, you should first check your records or contact your tax preparer. If your refund information appears correct, call the IRS toll-free assistance line at 800-829-1040 to check the status of your refund and confirm your address.</li>
</ul>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F08%2F13%2Fdoes-the-irs-owe-you-money%2F&amp;title=Does%20the%20IRS%20Owe%20You%20Money%3F">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/13/does-the-irs-owe-you-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds launch nationwide I-9 audit</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/07/16/feds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/07/16/feds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From HRMorining.com To further prove that immigration reform is still on the front burner, Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced its plan to implement a nationwide audit of employer I-9s. ICE announced that it’s drawing up Notices of Inspection to review the I-9 records of 652 employers — names not released yet. In some instances, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From HRMorining.com</em></p>
<p>To further prove that immigration reform is still on the front burner, Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced its plan to implement a nationwide audit of employer I-9s. </p>
<p>ICE announced that it’s drawing up  Notices of Inspection to review the I-9 records of 652 employers — names not released yet. In some instances, the notices will include subpoenas for records such as</p>
<p>  >> quarterly wage reports<br />
  >> EINs<br />
  >> business licenses<br />
  >> correspondence from Social Security Administration regarding no-match letters, and<br />
  >> payroll data. </p>
<p>Employers whose I-9-related records don’t pass muster with ICE will then receive Notices of Intent to Fine.  Also in the announcement, ICE officials said the audit is just a “first step,” so employers probably can expect more audits and inspections.</p>
<p>What happens if you’re contacted for an audit? Make sure you know:</p>
<p>The name and contact information of company legal counsel. If the company’s legal counsel is not in-house, there should be written instructions for personnel to contact outside counsel immediately.<br />
Who, in HR or otherwise, will be the the company’s representative for the ICE investigation or audit. You’ll want all communication with ICE channeled through that person to avoid redundancy or contradictions in information.<br />
The names of company managers who should be informed of an ICE investigation or audit.<br />
And keep in mind:</p>
<p>  >> An investigator may contact you and ask for an interview, but you have the right to refer the investigator to an attorney.<br />
  >> An investigator has no right to files and records without a search warrant or subpoena.<br />
  >> Once you’re informed of an intent to investigate, take special care to secure all related records. Destruction or loss of records after notification could be seen as an attempt to destroy evidence or sabotage the investigation. </p>
<p>Article:  <a href="http://www.hrmorning.com/feds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit/" target="_blank">http://www.hrmorning.com/feds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit/</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F07%2F16%2Ffeds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit%2F&amp;title=Feds%20launch%20nationwide%20I-9%20audit">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/07/16/feds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Update on Employment Eligibility Verification Form</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/06/29/uscis-update-on-employment-eligibility-verification-form/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/06/29/uscis-update-on-employment-eligibility-verification-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From USCIS The current I-9 form lists an expiration date of 6/30/09. However, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the form will remain valid after this date. On June 26, USCIS asked the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approved continued use of the current version. While the request is pending, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From USCIS</em><br />
The current I-9 form lists an expiration date of 6/30/09. However, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the form will remain valid after this date.</p>
<p>On June 26, USCIS asked the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approved continued use of the current version. While the request is pending, the form will not expire, despite the date listed at the top of the first page.  When the extension is approved — and a new expiration date is set — USCIS will update the form. For the time being, continue to use the form dated “Rev. 02/02/09&#8243; at the bottom of each page and the June 30 expiration date at the top.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> When the form is updated by USCIS,  Staff One will update the form provided to its clients at that time.  </p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F06%2F29%2Fuscis-update-on-employment-eligibility-verification-form%2F&amp;title=USCIS%20Update%20on%20Employment%20Eligibility%20Verification%20Form">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/06/29/uscis-update-on-employment-eligibility-verification-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New COBRA Rules May Cause Cash Flow Woes for Small Businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/23/new-cobra-rules-may-cause-cash-flow-woes-for-small-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/23/new-cobra-rules-may-cause-cash-flow-woes-for-small-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staff One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One aspect of the recently approved federal stimulus bill &#8211; the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -offers eligible terminated employees a 65 percent discount on COBRA coverage.  Enacted in 1986, COBRA allows former employees to continue their health insurance coverage for up to 18 months after they are terminated.  The issue facing business owners is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One aspect of the recently approved federal stimulus bill &#8211; the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -offers eligible terminated employees a 65 percent discount on COBRA coverage.  Enacted in 1986, COBRA allows former employees to continue their health insurance coverage for up to 18 months after they are terminated.</p>
<p> The issue facing business owners is that they must pay 65 percent of the COBRA premium and then file for reimbursement through a payroll tax credit.  Employees pay the other 35 percent.  This discounted rate could potentially cause a dramatic increase in COBRA election by former employees.</p>
<p> To avoid substantial penalties, employers were required to mail out COBRA notices by April 18, 2009 to eligible employees who had been laid off since September 1, 2008.  This new regulation affects most companies with 20 or more employees.</p>
<p>Some companies are worried that the federal requirement could cause cash flow problems because of the up-to-three-month delay for reimbursement.  And cash flow problems could cause some financially strapped companies to lay off more employees, freeze or cut salaries, or eliminate some benefits.</p>
<p><strong>How the new COBRA rules work:</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The federal government will provide a 65 percent subsidy for up to nine months of the COBRA premium retroactive to March 1 for certain terminated employees.</li>
<li>To be entitled to the subsidy, employees must have been involuntarily terminated between September 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, and must be eligible for COBRA.</li>
<li>A special election period exists for individuals involuntarily terminated on or after last September 1 who had not elected COBRA.  They will have 60 more days after receiving the notice to elect coverage, which is retroactive to March 1 if they lost their jobs before then.</li>
<li>The employer pays the 65 percent on the employee&#8217;s behalf and is then reimbursed through a payroll tax credit.  Large companies may be reimbursed either weekly or monthly, but smaller employers must file for the credit with their quarterly payroll taxes.</li>
<li>The employee must pay 35 percent of COBRA before the employer can request reimbursement of the other 65 percent.  Employers that do not charge the full COBRA premium will not be entitled to reimbursement of 65 percent of the maximum COBRA premium.</li>
</ul>
<p> For more information, visit <a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-09-27.pdf" target="_blank">www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-09-27.pdf</a> or <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/cobra.html" target="_blank">www.dol.gov/ebsa/cobra.html</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F04%2F23%2Fnew-cobra-rules-may-cause-cash-flow-woes-for-small-businesses%2F&amp;title=New%20COBRA%20Rules%20May%20Cause%20Cash%20Flow%20Woes%20for%20Small%20Businesses">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/23/new-cobra-rules-may-cause-cash-flow-woes-for-small-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Delays E-Verify for Federal Contractors</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/19/uscis-delays-e-verify-for-federal-contractors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/19/uscis-delays-e-verify-for-federal-contractors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From USCIS Website The applicability date of the final rule requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to begin using U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) E-Verify system has been pushed back by six weeks to June 30, 2009. The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (collectively known as the Federal Acquisitions Regulatory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From USCIS Website</em><br />
The applicability date of the final rule requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to begin using U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) E-Verify system has been pushed back by six weeks to June 30, 2009.</p>
<p>The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (collectively known as the Federal Acquisitions Regulatory Councils) will publish an amendment in the <em>Federal Register</em> tomorrow postponing the applicability of the final rule until June 30, 2009. The rule requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to agree to electronically verify the employment eligibility of their employees was first published on Nov. 14, 2008, and went into effect on Jan 19, 2009.</p>
<p>The extension provides the Administration an adequate opportunity to review the entire rule prior to its applicability to federal contractors and subcontractors.</p>
<p>For more information on E-Verify, visit <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/everify" target="_Blank">www.uscis.gov/everify</a>.</p>
<p>Related Document at <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/UpdateContractor_%20Rule_Extended_16apr09.pdf" target="_Blank">Applicability Date for E-Verify Federal Contractor Rule Extended</a> (27KB PDF)</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F04%2F19%2Fuscis-delays-e-verify-for-federal-contractors%2F&amp;title=USCIS%20Delays%20E-Verify%20for%20Federal%20Contractors">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/19/uscis-delays-e-verify-for-federal-contractors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discipline, Documentation and Termination</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/09/discipline-documentation-and-termination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/09/discipline-documentation-and-termination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staff One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Staff One and our Client Companies are at-will employers in all states where applicable. This means that, in the absence of a union contract or other employment contract limiting an employer&#8217;s right to discharge or stating a specific term or duration of employment, the employer is free to hire and fire at any time for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staff One and our Client Companies are at-will employers in all states where applicable. This means that, in the absence of a union contract or other employment contract limiting an employer&#8217;s right to discharge or stating a specific term or duration of employment, the employer is free to hire and fire at any time for any reason &#8211; or for no reason at all. However, court decisions and new statutes in recent years have created a more complex employment situation.</p>
<p>Federal and state laws may limit what can be considered in making an employment decision. You cannot base an employment decision on race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, veterans&#8217; status, filing a workers&#8217; compensation claim, use of benefit plans, serving on a jury, etc.</p>
<p>Courts have also expanded potential liability for employers who discharge employees in violation of &#8220;Public Policy&#8221; reasons.  For example, if an employee accuses his employer of firing him for refusing to carry out some unlawful request or claims he was fired for reporting allegedly unlawful acts on the part of his employer, that person could be considered as a &#8220;whistleblower&#8221; and can bring a wrongful discharge lawsuit.</p>
<p>While employment lawsuits arise out of all sorts of circumstances, the event which causes most legal actions is a discharge or termination of employment. Therefore, we must be increasingly sensitive to what can and cannot be done in connection with a termination. The manner in which a termination is handled is critical.</p>
<p>Successful supervisors avoid having to discipline employees by treating them in a fair and reasonable way. Once employees understand what is expected of them, they will usually do their jobs effectively. Do not be afraid to ask for the kind of action you expect from individuals. How else will they know?</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Discipline System</strong></p>
<p>If discipline becomes necessary, Staff One advocates a progressive discipline system to deal with problem employees and minimize the possibility of wrongful discharge and discrimination claims.  The system basically imposes goals, timetables, and progressively greater disciplinary measures upon an employee whose performance continues to be unacceptable. The system also recognizes that certain infractions or misconduct will be sufficient for immediate discharge. It is absolutely mandatory that this system be used uniformly with all employees.</p>
<p> Below are the steps to an effective progressive discipline system.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Step 1: Verbal Warning</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">A verbal warning is usually adequate for a first offense. Be sure to discuss the problem in private with the employee, explaining what was done wrong and what will happen if another violation occurs. Be sure to document the warning in writing, and send a record of the conversation to Staff One to be placed in the employee&#8217;s personnel file.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Step 2: Written Warning</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">If after receiving a verbal warning the offense is repeated, a written warning should be used.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Review the facts of the case with the employee and in the presence of another supervisor at your level or above. Tell the employee what action will be considered if another violation occurs. A limit should be set on the number of written warnings allowed before other action is taken. Make a record of the meeting, stating the facts that were reviewed with the employee and the action taken (use Staff One&#8217;s <em>Employee Written Warning Notice</em>). Have the employee sign the notice, after allowing him or her to enter comments. If the employee refuses to sign, have the supervisor sign the notice attesting to the employee&#8217;s refusal. Send the warning to Staff One to be placed in the employee&#8217;s personnel file.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Step 3: Suspension</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">A suspension without pay may be considered for employees as deemed necessary. Contact your Staff One Client Service Executive or Staff One&#8217;s Corporate HR Department for guidance.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Step 4: Discharge</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Terminating an employee can present a difficult and sometimes hazardous situation. A recent nationwide survey showed that half of all companies that fired anyone had a suit or legal charge brought against them. You can help minimize this risk by considering the effects of any termination. It is always unpleasant to terminate an employee, but try to carry out the termination in a rational manner, not out of anger and never on the spur of the moment.</p>
<p>Call Staff One Client Services Department or your Client Service Executive before proceeding with any termination action. Together, we will discuss your plan and the reason(s) for the termination.</p>
<p>Many times, you may overlook the &#8220;protected activities&#8221; an employee might say are the <strong>real </strong>reasons for the termination. For instance, has the employee recently filed a workers&#8217; compensation<strong> </strong>claim (a &#8220;protected activity&#8221;)?<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Termination Meetings</strong></p>
<p>This is a crucial step in the process. Terminating an employee is never easy, and the very fact that it is such an uncomfortable situation may cause you to be nervous or make a mistake. So, before you terminate an employee, contact your Staff One Client Service Executive or Staff One&#8217;s Corporate HR Department for guidance.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F04%2F09%2Fdiscipline-documentation-and-termination%2F&amp;title=Discipline%2C%20Documentation%20and%20Termination">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/09/discipline-documentation-and-termination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Staff One Offers Incentive Program to Companies Seeking HR Outsourcing Services</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/26/staff-one-offers-incentive-program-to-companies-seeking-hr-outsourcing-services/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/26/staff-one-offers-incentive-program-to-companies-seeking-hr-outsourcing-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus Package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DALLAS, TX. (March 26, 2009) – Staff One, Inc., a leading provider of HR Outsourcing solutions, today announced a new program that will help small and medium-sized companies optimize their Human Resources costs, stay current with new employment laws and gain access to benefits typically enjoyed by much larger companies. The Staff One HR Outsourcing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DALLAS, TX. (March 26, 2009) – Staff One, Inc., a leading provider of HR Outsourcing solutions, today announced a new program that will help small and medium-sized companies optimize their Human Resources costs, stay current with new employment laws and gain access to benefits typically enjoyed by much larger companies.</p>
<p>The <strong>Staff One HR Outsourcing Business Stimulus Program</strong> is designed for businesses with fewer than 750 employees. Participants in the program will receive a wide array of HR services that are typically only available to FORTUNE 500 companies.</p>
<p>For additional details on the program, companies can visit <a href="http://www.staffone.com/stimulus/" target="_blank">www.staffone.com/stimulus</a>. To qualify for the program, companies must contact Staff One prior to April 15, 2009 and become a client by June 1, 2009. Existing clients are not eligible for the program.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">To read the full press release, click </span></strong></span><a href="http://www.staffone.com/media/press_releases/032009_staff_one_stimulus.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">here</span></strong></span></a><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">.</span></strong></span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F03%2F26%2Fstaff-one-offers-incentive-program-to-companies-seeking-hr-outsourcing-services%2F&amp;title=Staff%20One%20Offers%20Incentive%20Program%20to%20Companies%20Seeking%20HR%20Outsourcing%20Services">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/26/staff-one-offers-incentive-program-to-companies-seeking-hr-outsourcing-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Revises Employment Eligibility Verification I-9 Form</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/24/uscis-revises-employment-eligibility-verification-i-9-form/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/24/uscis-revises-employment-eligibility-verification-i-9-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has submitted to the Federal Register an interim final rule that revises the list of documents acceptable for the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, process. The revised form will improve the security of the employment authorization verification process.  Your company will be required to use the revised form for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has submitted to the Federal Register an interim final rule that revises the list of documents acceptable for the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, process. The revised form will improve the security of the employment authorization verification process.  Your company will be required to use the revised form for all new hires and to re-verify any employee with expiring employment authorization beginning on <strong>April 3, 2009</strong>.</p>
<p>The revised Form I-9 reflects changes made to the list of documents acceptable for Form I-9 in accordance with the Department of Homeland Security&#8217;s (DHS) recent interim final rule. The rule furthers DHS&#8217;s ongoing effort to increase the security of the employment authorization verification process.</p>
<p><strong>What is the difference between the revised Form I-9 and the old one?</strong></p>
<p>The biggest difference in the revised Form I-9 is that all documents presented during the verification process must be unexpired. Other than several technical updates, the following documents have been added or removed:</p>
<p><strong>Two documents have been added to List A (Documents that Establish Both Identity and Employment Authorization) on the List of Acceptable Documents:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A temporary I-551 printed notation on a machine-readable immigrant visa in addition to the foreign passport with a temporary I-551 stamp; and</li>
<li>A passport from the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) or the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) with a valid Form I-94 or Form I-94A indicating nonimmigrant admission under the Compact of Free Association Between the United States and the FSM or RMI.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Three documents were removed from List A of the List of Acceptable Documents:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Form I-688, Temporary Resident Card;</li>
<li>Form I-688A, Employment Authorization Card; and</li>
<li>Form I-688B, Employment Authorization Card.</li>
</ul>
<p>Beginning April 3, 2009, your company may only accept documents listed on the List of Acceptable Documents on the revised Form I-9. When an employee must be re-verified because his or her employment authorization has expired, you should ensure that they use the revised Form I-9 with its new List of Acceptable Documents. You cannot re-verify the employee by completing Section 3 &#8211; Updating and Re-verification on a previous version of the Form I-9.</p>
<p><strong>The current edition of Form I-9, dated 06/05/2007, will no longer be valid for use on or after April 3, 2009.  </strong><strong>Employers who continue to use the 06/05/2007 edition of Form I-9 on or after that date may be subject to civil money penalties.</strong></p>
<p>The revised I-9 will be available on the Staff One online forms repository beginning on April 3, 2009.</p>
<p>For more details on employment eligibility verification, you can visit the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website at <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/" target="_blank">www.uscis.gov</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F03%2F24%2Fuscis-revises-employment-eligibility-verification-i-9-form%2F&amp;title=USCIS%20Revises%20Employment%20Eligibility%20Verification%20I-9%20Form">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/24/uscis-revises-employment-eligibility-verification-i-9-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New FMLA</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/20/the-new-fmla-january-16-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/20/the-new-fmla-january-16-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Effective January 16, 2009, the new FMLA rules will have an impact on companies in PEO relationships. In addition to other changes, these rules make FMLA compliance optional to employer with less than 50 employees.  At a high level, the new rules require that HR professionals master 10 key changes to the regulation: Military caregiver [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Effective January 16, 2009, the new FMLA rules will have an impact on companies in PEO relationships. In addition to other changes, these rules make FMLA compliance optional to employer with less than 50 employees.  At a high level, the new rules require that HR professionals master 10 key changes to the regulation:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Military caregiver leave:</strong> Implements the requirement to expand FMLA protections for family members caring for a covered service member with a serious injury or illness incurred while on active duty. These family members are able to take up to 26 workweeks of leave in a 12-month period.</li>
<li><strong>Leave for &#8220;qualifying exigencies&#8221; for families of National Guard and Reserve members:</strong> The law allows families of National Guard and Reserve personnel on active duty to take FMLA job-protected leave to manage their affairs &#8211; &#8220;qualifying exigencies.&#8221; The rules define &#8220;qualifying exigencies&#8221; as situations involving: 1) short-notice deployment, 2) military events and related activities, 3) childcare and school activities, 4) financial and legal arrangements, 5) counseling, 6) rest and recuperation, 7) post-deployment activities and 8 ) additional activities where the employer and employee agree to the leave.</li>
<li><strong>New employer notice obligations:</strong> The final rules consolidate all employer notice requirements into a &#8220;one-stop&#8221; section of the regulations to clear up some conflicting provisions and time periods. Further, they clarify and strengthen employer notice requirements so employers can better inform employees about their FMLA rights and obligations, and allow for a smoother exchange of information between employers and employees.</li>
<li><strong>New employee notice rights:</strong> The final rules modify the current provision that had been interpreted to allow some employees to notify their employers of their need for FMLA leave up to two full business days after an absence, even if they could provide notice sooner. Under the final rules, the employee must follow the employer&#8217;s normal and customary call-in procedures, unless there are unusual circumstances.</li>
<li><strong>New medical certification process:</strong> The final rules recognize the advent of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the applicability of HIPAA&#8217;s medical privacy rule to communications between employers and employees&#8217; health care providers. Responding to concerns about medical privacy, the rules add a requirement that limits who may contact the health care provider and bans an employee&#8217;s direct supervisor from making the contact.</li>
<li><strong>Clarification of waivers of rights:</strong> The DOL has finalized its longstanding position that employees may voluntarily settle their FMLA claims without court or departmental approval. However, prospective waivers of FMLA rights will continue to be prohibited.</li>
<li><strong>Definition of &#8220;serious health condition&#8221;:</strong> While the rules retain individual definitions of &#8220;serious health condition,&#8221; they add guidance on some regulatory matters. If an employee is taking leave involving more than three consecutive calendar days of incapacity plus two visits to a health care provider, the two visits must occur within 30 days of the period of incapacity. The rules define &#8220;periodic visits to a health care provider&#8221; for chronic serious health conditions as at least two visits to a health care provider per year.</li>
<li><strong>Clarification of light-duty FMLA rules:</strong> At least two courts have held that an employee uses up his or her 12-week FMLA leave while on a &#8220;light-duty&#8221; assignment. Under the final rules, time spent in light-duty work does not count against an employee&#8217;s FMLA leave entitlement, and the employee&#8217;s right to job restoration is held in abeyance during the light-duty period. If an employee is voluntarily doing light-duty work, he or she is not on FMLA leave.</li>
<li><strong>Application of FMLA leave to awarding perfect attendance awards:</strong> The final rules change how perfect attendance awards are treated to allow employers to deny a &#8220;perfect attendance&#8221; award to an employee who does not have perfect attendance because he or she took FMLA leave-but only if the employer treats employees taking non-FMLA leave in an identical way.</li>
<li><strong>Clarification of &#8220;leave stacking&#8221; rules:</strong> The updated rule contains technical changes to be consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide Inc. The court ruled that the regulation&#8217;s so-called &#8220;categorical&#8221; penalty (requiring an employer to provide 12 additional weeks of FMLA-protected leave after the employee had already taken 30 weeks of leave ) was inconsistent with the statutory limit of only 12 weeks of FMLA leave and contrary to the law&#8217;s remedial requirement that an employee demonstrate individual harm. The new rule removes these penalties and clarifies that if an employee suffers individual harm because the employer did not follow the notification rules, the employer may be liable.</li>
</ul>
<p>The new employer notice obligation will be the most critical to follow.  There are new FMLA forms and deadlines for the notification.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F02%2F20%2Fthe-new-fmla-january-16-2009%2F&amp;title=The%20New%20FMLA">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/20/the-new-fmla-january-16-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Delays Requirement to Use Revised I-9 Form</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/17/us-delays-requirement-to-use-revised-i-9-form/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/17/us-delays-requirement-to-use-revised-i-9-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.10.35/blog/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By SHRM Online staff Officials with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) have delayed until April 3, 2009, a requirement that employers must use a revised version of the employment eligibility verification form–known as the I-9 form. According to an interim rule published in December 2008, employers were supposed to begin using the revised [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By SHRM Online staff </em><br />
Officials with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) have delayed until April 3, 2009, a requirement that employers must use a revised version of the employment eligibility verification form–known as the I-9 form. According to an <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-29874.htm" target="_Blank">interim rule</a> published in December 2008, employers were supposed to begin using the revised verification form on Feb. 2, 2009. However, when President Obama took office, the White House issued a directive to all federal agencies asking them to review any regulations introduced by the Bush administration that had not taken effect before Jan. 20, 2009.</p>
<p>USCIS officials stated that the 60-day delay should provide adequate time to complete a full review of the new form and employment verification requirements. A notice announcing the delay was set to appear in the Federal Register. In addition, the USCIS will reopen the public comment period on the new rule for 30 days, until March 4, 2009. Employers must complete a Form I-9 for all newly hired employees to verify their identity and authorization to work in the United States. The interim final rule as published would have revised the types of acceptable identity and employment authorization documents employers can accept from new hires. </p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F02%2F17%2Fus-delays-requirement-to-use-revised-i-9-form%2F&amp;title=USCIS%20Delays%20Requirement%20to%20Use%20Revised%20I-9%20Form">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/17/us-delays-requirement-to-use-revised-i-9-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/about/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/blog/?page_id=2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Founded in 1988, Staff One is a leading Human Resources Outsourcing firm with an ESAC accredited and bonded PEO service offering. Staff One operates as a full-service human resources department and delivers a comprehensive range of solutions that provides our clients with a level of support and value previously only available at much larger companies. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Founded in 1988, <a href="http://www.staffone.com" target="_Blank">Staff One</a> is a leading Human Resources Outsourcing firm with an ESAC accredited and bonded PEO service offering. Staff One operates as a full-service human resources department and delivers a comprehensive range of solutions that provides our clients with a level of support and value previously only available at much larger companies. By aggregating the buying power of hundreds of firms, we provide premium benefits, risk management, compliance management, payroll outsourcing, tax administration and strategic HR services to our customers, so they can focus on growing their core business. For more information, visit <a href="http://www.staffone.com" target="_Blank">www.staffone.com</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2Fabout%2F&amp;title=About">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/01/29/lilly-ledbetter-fair-pay-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/01/29/lilly-ledbetter-fair-pay-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 29, 2009 President Obama signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.  This act overrules the U. S. Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in the Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &#38; Rubber Company, Inc. opening the door for employees file claims at a much later date than originally ruled.  This act raises many questions for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 29, 2009 President Obama signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.  This act overrules the U. S. Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in the Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &amp; Rubber Company, Inc. opening the door for employees file claims at a much later date than originally ruled.</p>
<p> This act raises many questions for employers that have yet to be addressed or answered.  Let&#8217;s first talk about the areas of this law that we do know about.  First, this law is <em>retroactive</em> to May 28, 2007 meaning that employees that have been, or may have been, discriminated against since this date can file a claim.  Congress believed the previous decision unduly restricted the time period an employee had for filing pay discrimination claims.</p>
<p> Under Ledbetter an unlawful employment practice occurs when:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The discriminatory pay decision is made</li>
<li>An individual becomes subject to the discriminatory pay decision, or</li>
<li>An individual is affected by the discriminatory compensation decision or other practice.</li>
</ul>
<p>In short, what this means to employers is that each time an employee receives a wages, benefits or other compensation <em>tainted by the discriminatory pay decision</em> the deadline starts over.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s talk about the questions that Ledbetter brings up.  What records should a company examine and retain?  How long should they be retained?  Should they do a self audit?</p>
<p>Since this is a new law there are no court cases or rulings on any of these questions.  However, initial analysis by most law firms says you should retain pertinent records indefinitely.  Outside of the IRS regulations on record retention the only real guidance comes out of federal contracting regulations which require that all records be retained for a period of 2 years for companies with over 150 employees and 1 year for companies fewer than 150 employees.  However, there is no evidence that these regulations will be used in governing Ledbetter.</p>
<p>With this in mind companies may consider conducting a self audit of their records.  There are no provisions under Ledbetter where a company avoids penalties due to accidental, unintentional or uncovered violations.  A violation is a violation.</p>
<p>Self audits would involve an examination of written policies relating to pay decisions in starting pay, promotional pay and merit pay increases.  For companies without a formal pay structure this could particularly dangerous under Ledbetter since managers would have wide discretion in setting pay.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F01%2F29%2Flilly-ledbetter-fair-pay-act%2F&amp;title=Lilly%20Ledbetter%20Fair%20Pay%20Act">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/01/29/lilly-ledbetter-fair-pay-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

