<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR Bits &#187; HR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrbits.com/tag/hr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrbits.com</link>
	<description>Produced by Staff One, Inc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>5 Tips on How to Show up to Work on Time</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2011/03/03/5-tips-on-how-to-show-up-to-work-on-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2011/03/03/5-tips-on-how-to-show-up-to-work-on-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Stephan Terrill Some of us struggle with getting to work on time, and this can cause a problem in the workplace. If you are habitually late for work, this could result in disciplinary action, possibly including termination of your employment.  Here are 5 tips that can help you make it to work on time: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> By Stephan Terrill </em></p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img title="5 Tips on How to Show up to Work on Time" src="http://www.hrbits.com/blog_img/runningLate.jpg" alt="Staff One - 5 Tips on How to Show up to Work on Time" width="200" height="184" /></dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p>Some of us struggle with getting to work on time, and this can cause a problem in the workplace.</p>
<p>If you are habitually late for work, this could result in disciplinary action, possibly including termination of your employment.  Here are 5 tips that can help you make it to work on time:</p>
<p>1.     <strong>Lay out your clothes the night before work.</strong> This will reduce decision making in the morning and shave off 5 to 10 minutes of prep time.</p>
<p>2.     <strong>Organize your morning routine.</strong> See if you can pare down the time it takes to get ready in the morning.  Shorter showers,  cutting out TV watching, and perhaps brewing your coffee at home rather than stopping for the first cup of joe can help you get an earlier start.</p>
<p>3.     <strong>Leave early</strong>.  If at all possible, leave for work early to help keep you from feeling rushed or speeding in traffic.  In some cases, leaving your house even five or 10 minutes earlier could cut your drive by 10-20 minutes.</p>
<p>4.     <strong>Listen to traffic reports</strong>.  Know where the trouble spots are and take advantage of alternate routes to avoid sitting in traffic.</p>
<p>5.     <strong>Carpool. </strong>This will helps in two ways.  Someone else is counting on you to be on time and in larger cities, it may enable you to utilize the HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) Lane, which will speed up your drive time.</p>
<p>Remember, it all comes down to disciplining yourself to getting to work on time.  Sometimes, being late is unavoidable, so be sure you know whom to contact when coming in late.  Always refer to your company handbook for specifics on workplace attendance policies.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2011%2F03%2F03%2F5-tips-on-how-to-show-up-to-work-on-time%2F&amp;title=5%20Tips%20on%20How%20to%20Show%20up%20to%20Work%20on%20Time">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2011/03/03/5-tips-on-how-to-show-up-to-work-on-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Do I Retain My Top Performers</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2011/02/22/how-do-i-retain-my-top-performers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2011/02/22/how-do-i-retain-my-top-performers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talent Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Key employee retention is critical to the long term health and success of your business. Managers readily agree that retaining your best employees ensures customer satisfaction, product sales, satisfied coworkers and reporting staff, effective succession planning and organizational knowledge and learning. If managers can cite these facts so well, why do they behave in ways [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key employee retention is critical to the long term health and success of your business. Managers readily agree that retaining your best employees ensures customer satisfaction, product sales, satisfied coworkers and reporting staff, effective succession planning and organizational knowledge and learning. If managers can cite these facts so well, why do they behave in ways that so frequently encourage great employees to quit their jobs?</p>
<p>Employee retention matters. Organizational issues such as training time and costs, lost knowledge, mourning, insecure coworkers and a costly candidate search aside, failing to retain a key employee is costly. Various estimates suggest that losing a middle manager costs an organization up to 100 percent of their salary. The loss of a senior executive is even more costly.</p>
<p>Employee retention is critically important for societal reasons as well. Over the next few years while Baby Boomers retire, the upcoming Generation X population numbers 44 million compared to 76 million Baby Boomers available for work. Simply stated, there are a lot fewer people available to work.</p>
<p>One of the primary measures of the health of your organization is employee retention. If you are losing critical staff members, you can safely bet that other people in their departments are looking as well. Exit interviews with departing employees provide valuable information you can use to retain remaining staff. Pay attention to what they say. You&#8217;ll never have a more significant source of data about the health of your organization.</p>
<p>Here are 4 tips to help you in your employee retention efforts:</p>
<p><strong>A satisfied employee knows clearly what is expected from her/him every day at work.</strong> Changing expectations keeps employees on edge and creates unhealthy stress. They rob the employee of internal security and make the employee feel unsuccessful. Provide employees the specific framework within which they clearly know what is expected from them.</p>
<p><strong>The quality of supervision an employee receives is critical to employee retention.</strong> People leave managers and supervisors far more often than they leave companies or jobs. It is not enough that the supervisor is well liked or a nice person; starting with clear expectations of the employee, the supervisor has a critical role to play in retention. Anything a supervisor does to make an employee feel unvalued will contribute to turnover.</p>
<p>Many employee complaints center on these areas:</p>
<p>- Lack of clarity about expectations<br />
- Lack of clarity about earning potential<br />
- Lack of feedback about performance<br />
- Failure to hold scheduled meetings<br />
- Failure to provide an environment in which the employee believes they can succeed</p>
<p><strong>The ability of the employee to speak his or her mind freely within the organization is another key factor in employee retention.</strong> Does your organization solicit ideas and provide an environment in which employees are comfortable giving feedback? If so, your employees will offer ideas, give constructive criticism and commit to continuous improvement. If not, employees will bite their tongues or find themselves constantly &#8216;in trouble&#8217;, until they leave.</p>
<p><strong>Talent and skills utilization is another factor key employees seek in the workplace.</strong> A motivated employee wants to contribute to work areas outside of his or her specific job description. How many people could contribute far more than they currently do? You just need to know their skills, talent and experience, and take time to utilize them.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2011%2F02%2F22%2Fhow-do-i-retain-my-top-performers%2F&amp;title=How%20Do%20I%20Retain%20My%20Top%20Performers">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2011/02/22/how-do-i-retain-my-top-performers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Ways to Deal with Workplace Romance</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2011/02/08/top-10-ways-to-deal-with-workplace-romance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2011/02/08/top-10-ways-to-deal-with-workplace-romance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By TJ Carter, SPHR Most of us have heard about David Letterman’s alleged affairs with his female subordinates, and this is a useful reminder for employers: create a systematic plan for dealing with workplace harassment and romantic relationships. And then follow it. As the Letterman case shows, the line between inappropriate behavior, romantic relationships, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> By TJ Carter, SPHR </em></p>
<p>Most of us have heard about David Letterman’s alleged affairs with his female subordinates, and this is a useful reminder for employers: create a systematic plan for dealing with workplace harassment and romantic relationships. And then follow it.</p>
<p>As the Letterman case shows, the line between inappropriate behavior, romantic relationships, and harassment can blur. Consensual relationships sometimes sour. Other times, employees enter relationships because they feel compelled to, believing that doing so is a prerequisite to success or advancement. And in the worst cases, employees are explicitly told or threatened that the relationship is a job requirement.</p>
<p>To protect themselves and their employees, employers must walk the difficult line between preventing and correcting harassment, without stifling all consensual, non-workplace conduct.</p>
<p>Here are 10 ways to help manage this sensitive subject:</p>
<p><strong>1) Start with a Harassment Prevention Policy.</strong></p>
<p>A solid harassment prevention policy is the first line of defense. But the existence of a policy on its own is not enough. To be effective, a policy must clearly identify who is protected, explain conduct that is prohibited, and tell employees where to report problems and get help. Additionally, supervisors and managers need to know what to do with information or complaints they receive from their employees. And to make sure everyone knows the rules, employers must be sure each employee has a copy of the current policy and know who to ask when they have questions.</p>
<p><strong>2) Training Requirements</strong></p>
<p>Although federal law does not require harassment training, it is highly recommended and may provide an affirmative defense for the employer when challenged. Also, some states such as California do require harassment training, so insure you check your state requirements.</p>
<p><strong>3) Train Everyone</strong></p>
<p>Training lets employees know company standards, and it tangibly demonstrates the company’s commitment. It is also a good opportunity to share information about the company and management. Taking steps to prevent unlawful harassment and discrimination can help the company avoid or reduce potential damages in litigation. It also reinforces to employees that the company takes the issue seriously.</p>
<p><strong>4) Adopt a Conflict of Interest Policy</strong></p>
<p>Employers can restrict relationships that can create an actual or potential conflict of interest, such as a relationship between a superior and a subordinate. In these situations, employers legitimately worry about the potential for the personal relationship to interfere with business judgment. For this reason, many employers’ policies discourage or prohibit relationships that can cause this conflict. Such policies may also specify that employees are expected to disclose relationships that may create a conflict, so the employer can take appropriate action to address any potential conflict. Be aware of state laws that might prohibit strict non-fraternization policies.</p>
<p><strong>5) Distinguish Harassment from Relationships</strong></p>
<p>Not every romantic relationship is ‘harassment’. Relationships can change though. When consensual relationships end, for example, employers must take seriously later complaints of mistreatment. In one case, an employee claimed a co-worker, with whom she had an on-again, off-again romantic relationship, created a hostile work environment. When the relationship ended, the employee complained to the company about her co-worker’s behavior, and the company responded by disciplining the co-worker. When the employee later sued, the company won because it had acted quickly to resolve the employee’s complaints.</p>
<p><strong>6) Do Not Create Temptation </strong></p>
<p>While employers have little control over how employees spend time away from work, they can do things to control conduct that can affect the workplace. For instance, employers should make clear that harassment prevention policies apply to all work-related events. Management should avoid holding company-sponsored events at venues that may encourage behavior that violates conduct policies. One obvious example is the high incident rate between alcohol and unwanted conduct. Employers also can reinforce that its technology, such as email and telephones, are for business use and not for conducting workplace romance.</p>
<p><strong>7) Consider Love Contracts</strong></p>
<p>Some employers ask romantically involved employees to sign a ‘consensual relationship agreement’ or a ‘love contract’. This document generally acknowledges a relationship, confirms that it is consensual and will not interfere with job performance, and reinforces the principles of the employer’s harassment prevention policy. The agreement usually states the employee’s obligation to notify the employer of conduct that violates the policy.</p>
<p><strong>8) Stay out of Employee Private Time</strong></p>
<p>As hard as it may be to accept, employers must recognize there is little they can do about consensual relationships between employees that do not affect their workplace performance or conduct.</p>
<p><strong>9) See it From the Eyes of Others</strong></p>
<p>Employees engaged in relationships are not the only ones who may be subject to a hostile work environment. In one case, the court established that a manager’s favoritism for multiple paramours can create a hostile work environment for other employees. In this case, a supervisor engaged in romantic relationships with several women who reported to him, and they were promoted and treated favorably. While a single act of preferential treatment is not unlawful harassment, the court held “severe or pervasive” sexual favoritism can be actionable conduct. And, the person suing need not be the victim of the conduct.</p>
<p><strong>10) Act on Violations or Complaints</strong></p>
<p>An employer’s most important duty is to act on complaints or anytime it becomes aware of potential violations of its harassment prevention policy. An investigation need not be error-free or conducted with sophisticated methods. But it must be prompt, conducted in good faith, and sufficiently thorough under the circumstances. Employers should take all complaints seriously because employees find it very difficult to bring forth these complaints. A complaint may involve a relatively trivial incident; however, an investigation may reveal a larger problem.</p>
<p>This information should not be construed as legal advice.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2011%2F02%2F08%2Ftop-10-ways-to-deal-with-workplace-romance%2F&amp;title=Top%2010%20Ways%20to%20Deal%20with%20Workplace%20Romance">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2011/02/08/top-10-ways-to-deal-with-workplace-romance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Staff One, Inc. Receives GNAA Award</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2010/01/08/staff-one-inc-receives-gnaa-award/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2010/01/08/staff-one-inc-receives-gnaa-award/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GNAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nashville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staff One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennesee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRENTWOOD, Tenn., January 8, 2010 &#8212; Staff One, Inc. was awarded second place in the “Most Informative – National” category at the Greater Nashville Apartment Association Trade Show held July 23, 2009 at LP Field in Nashville, Tenn. Staff One was among more than 100 exhibitors at the annual event, which connects apartment owners, managers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRENTWOOD, Tenn., January 8, 2010 &#8212; Staff One, Inc. was awarded second place in the “Most Informative – National” category at the Greater Nashville Apartment Association Trade Show held July 23, 2009 at LP Field in Nashville, Tenn. </p>
<p>Staff One was among more than 100 exhibitors at the annual event, which connects apartment owners, managers and leasing professionals with local and national companies that serve their industry. </p>
<p>“We are very pleased that Staff One was recognized by the GNAA,” said Dan Telford, Business Development Executive for Staff One. “We support the GNAA at every opportunity and really enjoyed participating in this year’s trade show.  We work hard to make sure our trade show exhibits convey the services Staff One provides, as well as sharing relevant information on how we can impact business owners and managers.”</p>
<p>With a presence in more than 41 states, Staff One is a leader in the HR Outsourcing industry, providing PEO services that include HR, benefits administration, risk management, compliance management, payroll and tax administration services to small businesses. Staff One has worked with clients in the property management industry for more than 20 years – playing a key role in decreasing employee turnover, maximizing occupancy rates and managing workers compensation risk.  As a result, Staff One’s clients have grown more than 500% since they started with Staff One.</p>
<p><strong>About Staff One</strong><br />
Founded in 1988, Staff One is a leading Human Resources Outsourcing firm with an ESAC accredited and bonded PEO service offering.  Staff One operates as a full-service human resources department and delivers a comprehensive range of solutions that provides our clients with a level of support and value previously only available at much larger companies.  By aggregating the buying power of hundreds of firms, Staff One provides premium benefits and benefits administration, risk management, compliance management, payroll outsourcing, tax administration and strategic HR services. Staff One currently serves clients with employees in more than 40 states. For more information, visit <a href="http://www.staffone.com" target="_blank">www.staffone.com</a>.</p>
<p><strong>About Greater Nashville Apartment Association</strong><br />
The Greater Nashville Apartment Association is a non-profit trade organization representing owners, management companies, apartment communities and suppliers to the multi-family industry.  </p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2010%2F01%2F08%2Fstaff-one-inc-receives-gnaa-award%2F&amp;title=Staff%20One%2C%20Inc.%20Receives%20GNAA%20Award">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2010/01/08/staff-one-inc-receives-gnaa-award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expiration Date of Employment Eligibility Verification Form I-9 Extended to Aug. 31, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/09/02/expiration-date-of-employment-eligibility-verification-form-i-9-extended-to-aug-31-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/09/02/expiration-date-of-employment-eligibility-verification-form-i-9-extended-to-aug-31-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From USCIS On August 27th, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the Office of Management and Budget has extended its approval of Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) to Aug. 31, 2012. Consequently, USCIS has amended the form to reflect a new revision date of Aug. 7, 2009. Employers may use the Form I-9 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From USCIS</em></p>
<p>On August 27th, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the Office of Management and Budget has extended its approval of Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) to Aug. 31, 2012. Consequently, USCIS has amended the form to reflect a new revision date of Aug. 7, 2009.</p>
<p>Employers may use the Form I-9 with the revision date of either Aug. 7, 2009 or Feb. 2, 2009. The revision dates are located on the bottom right-hand portion of the form.</p>
<p>Staff One clients should begin using the revised I-9 form for all new hires, effective immediately.  The new form can be found at <a href="http://www.staffone.com" target="_blank">www.staffone.com</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F09%2F02%2Fexpiration-date-of-employment-eligibility-verification-form-i-9-extended-to-aug-31-2012%2F&amp;title=Expiration%20Date%20of%20Employment%20Eligibility%20Verification%20Form%20I-9%20Extended%20to%20Aug.%2031%2C%202012">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/09/02/expiration-date-of-employment-eligibility-verification-form-i-9-extended-to-aug-31-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Contractors Must Use E-Verify Starting September 8, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/federal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/federal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A business coalition, including the U.S. Chamber and SHRM, has lost in its effort to have a court overturn the federal regulation requiring federal contractors to start using the E-Verify Program for federal contracts that are entered into or modified after September 8, 2009. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Maryland on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A business coalition, including the U.S. Chamber and SHRM, has lost in its effort to have a court overturn the federal regulation requiring federal contractors to start using the E-Verify Program for federal contracts that are entered into or modified after September 8, 2009.  The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Maryland on August 26, 2009, turned down all arguments raised by the plaintiffs and has opened the door for the rule to be applicable as planned on September 8, 2009. There is no word on whether or not the decision will be appealed.  The USCIS Web site has a <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=534bbd181e09d110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&#038;vgnextchannel=534bbd181e09d110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD">federal contractor page</a> as well as a <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=cb2a535e0869d110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&#038;vgnextchannel=534bbd181e09d110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD">series of Q&#038;As </a>on the rule that explains its provisions and application.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F08%2F27%2Ffederal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009%2F&amp;title=Federal%20Contractors%20Must%20Use%20E-Verify%20Starting%20September%208%2C%202009">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/federal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee vs. Independent Contractor – Ten Tips for Business Owners</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/employee-vs-independent-contractor-%e2%80%93-ten-tips-for-business-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/employee-vs-independent-contractor-%e2%80%93-ten-tips-for-business-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source http://www.irs.gov  IRS Summertime Tax Tip 2009-20 If you are a small business owner, whether you hire people as independent contractors or as employees will impact how much taxes you pay and the amount of taxes you withhold from their paychecks. Additionally, it will affect how much additional cost your business must bear, what documents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="98%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="content"><i>Source <a href="http://www.irs.gov">http://www.irs.gov</a></i> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<table border="0" width="auto">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>IRS Summertime Tax Tip 2009-20<br />
If you are a small business owner, whether you hire people as independent contractors or as employees will impact how much taxes you pay and the amount of taxes you withhold from their paychecks. Additionally, it will affect how much additional cost your business must bear, what documents and information they must provide to you, and what tax documents you must give to them.Here are the top ten things every business owner should know about hiring people as independent contractors versus hiring them as employees.1. Three characteristics are used by the IRS to determine the relationship between businesses and workers: Behavioral Control, Financial Control, and the Type of Relationship. </p>
<p>2. Behavioral Control covers facts that show whether the business has a right to direct or control how the work is done through instructions, training or other means. </p>
<p>3. Financial Control covers facts that show whether the business has a right to direct or control the financial and business aspects of the worker&#8217;s job. </p>
<p>4. The Type of Relationship factor relates to how the workers and the business owner perceive their relationship.</p>
<p>5. If you have the right to control or direct not only what is to be done, but also how it is to be done, then your workers are most likely employees.</p>
<p>6. If you can direct or control only the result of the work done &#8212; and not the means and methods of accomplishing the result &#8212; then your workers are probably independent contractors. </p>
<p>7. Employers who misclassify workers as independent contractors can end up with substantial tax bills. Additionally, they can face penalties for failing to pay employment taxes and for failing to file required tax forms. </p>
<p>8. Workers can avoid higher tax bills and lost benefits if they know their proper status.</p>
<p>9. Both employers and workers can ask the IRS to make a determination on whether a specific individual is an independent contractor or an employee by filing a Form SS-8 – Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding – with the IRS.</p>
<p>10. You can learn more about the critical determination of a worker’s status as an Independent Contractor or Employee at IRS.gov by selecting the Small Business link.  Additional resources include IRS Publication 15-A, Employer&#8217;s Supplemental Tax Guide, Publication 1779, Independent Contractor or Employee, and Publication 1976, Do You Qualify for Relief under Section 530? These publications and Form SS-8 are available on the IRS Web site or by calling the IRS at 800-829-3676 (800-TAX-FORM).</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div><a href="http://www.hrbits.com/businesses/small/article/0,,id=99921,00.html">Contractor vs. Employee</a></div>
</li>
<li>
<div><a href="http://www.hrbits.com/pub/irs-pdf/p1779.pdf">Publication 1779 </a></div>
</li>
<li>
<div><a href="http://www.hrbits.com/pub/irs-pdf/p15.pdf">Publication 15-A</a>  </div>
</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td width="5"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F08%2F27%2Femployee-vs-independent-contractor-%25e2%2580%2593-ten-tips-for-business-owners%2F&amp;title=Employee%20vs.%20Independent%20Contractor%20%E2%80%93%20Ten%20Tips%20for%20Business%20Owners">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/27/employee-vs-independent-contractor-%e2%80%93-ten-tips-for-business-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the IRS Owe You Money?</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/13/does-the-irs-owe-you-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/13/does-the-irs-owe-you-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source http://www.irs.gov If you have not filed a prior year tax return and are due a refund, you should consider filing the return to claim that refund. If you are missing a refund for a previously filed tax return, you should contact the IRS to check the status of your refund and confirm your current [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Source <a href="http://www.irs.gov" target="_blank">http://www.irs.gov</a> </em></p>
<p>If you have not filed a prior year tax return and are due a refund, you should consider filing the return to claim that refund. If you are missing a refund for a previously filed tax return, you should contact the IRS to check the status of your refund and confirm your current address.</p>
<p><strong>Unclaimed Refunds</strong></p>
<p>Some people may have had taxes withheld from their wages but were not required to file a tax return because they had too little income. Others may not have had any tax withheld but would be eligible for the refundable Earned Income Tax Credit.</p>
<ul>
<li>To collect this money a return must be filed with the IRS no later than three years from the due date of the return.</li>
<li>If no return is filed to claim the refund within three years, the money becomes the property of the U.S. Treasury.</li>
<li>There is no penalty assessed by the IRS for filing a late return qualifying for a refund.</li>
<li>Current and prior year tax forms and instructions are available on the Forms and Publications web page of IRS.gov or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).</li>
<li>Information about the Earned Income Tax Credit and how to claim it is also available on IRS.gov.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Undeliverable Refunds</strong></p>
<p>Were you expecting a refund check but didn&#8217;t get it?</p>
<ul>
<li>Refund checks are mailed to your last known address. Checks are returned to the IRS if you move without notifying the IRS or the U.S. Postal Service.</li>
<li>You may be able to update your address with the IRS on the &#8220;Where&#8217;s My Refund?&#8221; feature available on IRS.gov. You will be prompted to provide an updated address if there is an undeliverable check outstanding within the last 12 months.</li>
<li>You can also ensure the IRS has your correct address by filing Form 8822, Change of Address, which is available on IRS.gov or can be ordered by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).</li>
<li>If you do not have access to the Internet and think you may be missing a refund, you should first check your records or contact your tax preparer. If your refund information appears correct, call the IRS toll-free assistance line at 800-829-1040 to check the status of your refund and confirm your address.</li>
</ul>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F08%2F13%2Fdoes-the-irs-owe-you-money%2F&amp;title=Does%20the%20IRS%20Owe%20You%20Money%3F">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/08/13/does-the-irs-owe-you-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds launch nationwide I-9 audit</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/07/16/feds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/07/16/feds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From HRMorining.com To further prove that immigration reform is still on the front burner, Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced its plan to implement a nationwide audit of employer I-9s. ICE announced that it’s drawing up Notices of Inspection to review the I-9 records of 652 employers — names not released yet. In some instances, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From HRMorining.com</em></p>
<p>To further prove that immigration reform is still on the front burner, Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced its plan to implement a nationwide audit of employer I-9s. </p>
<p>ICE announced that it’s drawing up  Notices of Inspection to review the I-9 records of 652 employers — names not released yet. In some instances, the notices will include subpoenas for records such as</p>
<p>  >> quarterly wage reports<br />
  >> EINs<br />
  >> business licenses<br />
  >> correspondence from Social Security Administration regarding no-match letters, and<br />
  >> payroll data. </p>
<p>Employers whose I-9-related records don’t pass muster with ICE will then receive Notices of Intent to Fine.  Also in the announcement, ICE officials said the audit is just a “first step,” so employers probably can expect more audits and inspections.</p>
<p>What happens if you’re contacted for an audit? Make sure you know:</p>
<p>The name and contact information of company legal counsel. If the company’s legal counsel is not in-house, there should be written instructions for personnel to contact outside counsel immediately.<br />
Who, in HR or otherwise, will be the the company’s representative for the ICE investigation or audit. You’ll want all communication with ICE channeled through that person to avoid redundancy or contradictions in information.<br />
The names of company managers who should be informed of an ICE investigation or audit.<br />
And keep in mind:</p>
<p>  >> An investigator may contact you and ask for an interview, but you have the right to refer the investigator to an attorney.<br />
  >> An investigator has no right to files and records without a search warrant or subpoena.<br />
  >> Once you’re informed of an intent to investigate, take special care to secure all related records. Destruction or loss of records after notification could be seen as an attempt to destroy evidence or sabotage the investigation. </p>
<p>Article:  <a href="http://www.hrmorning.com/feds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit/" target="_blank">http://www.hrmorning.com/feds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit/</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F07%2F16%2Ffeds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit%2F&amp;title=Feds%20launch%20nationwide%20I-9%20audit">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/07/16/feds-launch-nationwide-i-9-audit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Update on Employment Eligibility Verification Form</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/06/29/uscis-update-on-employment-eligibility-verification-form/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/06/29/uscis-update-on-employment-eligibility-verification-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From USCIS The current I-9 form lists an expiration date of 6/30/09. However, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the form will remain valid after this date. On June 26, USCIS asked the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approved continued use of the current version. While the request is pending, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From USCIS</em><br />
The current I-9 form lists an expiration date of 6/30/09. However, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the form will remain valid after this date.</p>
<p>On June 26, USCIS asked the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approved continued use of the current version. While the request is pending, the form will not expire, despite the date listed at the top of the first page.  When the extension is approved — and a new expiration date is set — USCIS will update the form. For the time being, continue to use the form dated “Rev. 02/02/09&#8243; at the bottom of each page and the June 30 expiration date at the top.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> When the form is updated by USCIS,  Staff One will update the form provided to its clients at that time.  </p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F06%2F29%2Fuscis-update-on-employment-eligibility-verification-form%2F&amp;title=USCIS%20Update%20on%20Employment%20Eligibility%20Verification%20Form">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/06/29/uscis-update-on-employment-eligibility-verification-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee Rights Under USERRA</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/06/19/employee-rights-under-userra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/06/19/employee-rights-under-userra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staff One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USERRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VRR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) clarifies and strengthens the Veterans&#8217; Reemployment Rights (VRR) Statute. USERRA protects civilian job rights and benefits for veterans and members of Reserve components. USERRA also makes major improvements in protecting service member rights and benefits by clarifying the law, improving enforcement mechanisms, and adding Federal Government [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) clarifies and strengthens the Veterans&#8217; Reemployment Rights (VRR) Statute. USERRA protects civilian job rights and benefits for veterans and members of Reserve components.</p>
<p>USERRA also makes major improvements in protecting service member rights and benefits by clarifying the law, improving enforcement mechanisms, and adding Federal Government employees to those employees already eligible to receive Department of Labor assistance in processing claims.</p>
<p>USERRA establishes the cumulative length of time that an individual may be absent from work for military duty and retain reemployment rights up to five years (the previous law provided four years of active duty, plus an additional year if it was for the convenience of the Government). There are important exceptions to the five-year limit, including initial enlistments lasting more than five years, periodic National Guard and Reserve training duty, and involuntary active duty extensions and recalls, especially during a time of national emergency. USERRA clearly establishes that reemployment protection does not depend on the timing, frequency, duration, or nature of an individual&#8217;s service as long as the basic eligibility criteria are met.</p>
<p>In addition, USERRA provides protection for disabled veterans, requiring employers to make reasonable efforts to accommodate the disability. Service members convalescing from injuries received during service or training may have up to two years from the date of completion of service to return to their jobs or apply for reemployment.</p>
<p>USERRA provides that returning service-members are reemployed in the job that they would have attained had they not been absent for military service (the long-standing &#8220;escalator&#8221; principle), with the same seniority, status, and pay, as well as other rights and benefits determined by seniority. USERRA also requires that reasonable efforts (such as training or retraining) be made to enable returning service members to refresh or upgrade their skills to help them qualify for reemployment. The law clearly provides for alternative reemployment positions if the service member cannot qualify for the &#8220;escalator&#8221; position. USERRA also provides that while an individual is performing military service, he or she is deemed to be on a furlough or leave of absence and is entitled to the non-seniority rights accorded other individuals on non-military leaves of absence.</p>
<p>Health and pension plan coverage for service members is provided for by USERRA. Individuals performing military duty of more than 30 days may elect to continue employer sponsored health care for up to 24 months; however, they may be required to pay up to 102 percent of the full premium. For military service of less than 31 days, health care coverage is provided as if the service member had remained employed. USERRA clarifies pension plan coverage by making clear that all pension plans are protected.</p>
<p>The period an individual has to make application for reemployment or report back to work after military service is based on time spent on military duty. For service of less than 31 days, the service member must return at the beginning of the next regularly scheduled work period on the first full day after release from service, taking into account safe travel home plus an eight-hour rest period. For service of more than 30 days but less than 181 days, the service member must submit an application for reemployment within 14 days of release from service. For service of more than 180 days, an application for reemployment must be submitted within 90 days of release from service.</p>
<p>USERRA also requires that service members provide advance written or verbal notice to their employers for all military duty unless giving notice is impossible, unreasonable, or precluded by military necessity. An employee should provide notice as far in advance as is reasonable under the circumstances. Additionally, service members are able (but are not required) to use accrued vacation or annual leave while performing military duty.</p>
<p>The Department of Labor, through the Veterans&#8217; Employment and Training Service (VETS), provides assistance to all persons having claims under USERRA, including Federal and Postal Service employees.</p>
<p>Answers to Frequently Asked Questions For Reservists Being Called To Active Duty may be viewed at: <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq_911_2.html">http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq_911_2.html</a>.</p>
<p>To access a copy of the final rule and poster, visit <a href="http://www.dol.gov/vets/programs/userra/poster.htm">http://www.dol.gov/vets/programs/userra/poster.htm</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F06%2F19%2Femployee-rights-under-userra%2F&amp;title=Employee%20Rights%20Under%20USERRA">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/06/19/employee-rights-under-userra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Delays E-Verify for Federal Contractors</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/19/uscis-delays-e-verify-for-federal-contractors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/19/uscis-delays-e-verify-for-federal-contractors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From USCIS Website The applicability date of the final rule requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to begin using U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) E-Verify system has been pushed back by six weeks to June 30, 2009. The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (collectively known as the Federal Acquisitions Regulatory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From USCIS Website</em><br />
The applicability date of the final rule requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to begin using U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) E-Verify system has been pushed back by six weeks to June 30, 2009.</p>
<p>The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (collectively known as the Federal Acquisitions Regulatory Councils) will publish an amendment in the <em>Federal Register</em> tomorrow postponing the applicability of the final rule until June 30, 2009. The rule requiring federal contractors and subcontractors to agree to electronically verify the employment eligibility of their employees was first published on Nov. 14, 2008, and went into effect on Jan 19, 2009.</p>
<p>The extension provides the Administration an adequate opportunity to review the entire rule prior to its applicability to federal contractors and subcontractors.</p>
<p>For more information on E-Verify, visit <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/everify" target="_Blank">www.uscis.gov/everify</a>.</p>
<p>Related Document at <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/UpdateContractor_%20Rule_Extended_16apr09.pdf" target="_Blank">Applicability Date for E-Verify Federal Contractor Rule Extended</a> (27KB PDF)</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F04%2F19%2Fuscis-delays-e-verify-for-federal-contractors%2F&amp;title=USCIS%20Delays%20E-Verify%20for%20Federal%20Contractors">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/04/19/uscis-delays-e-verify-for-federal-contractors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Staff One Offers Incentive Program to Companies Seeking HR Outsourcing Services</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/26/staff-one-offers-incentive-program-to-companies-seeking-hr-outsourcing-services/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/26/staff-one-offers-incentive-program-to-companies-seeking-hr-outsourcing-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus Package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DALLAS, TX. (March 26, 2009) – Staff One, Inc., a leading provider of HR Outsourcing solutions, today announced a new program that will help small and medium-sized companies optimize their Human Resources costs, stay current with new employment laws and gain access to benefits typically enjoyed by much larger companies. The Staff One HR Outsourcing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DALLAS, TX. (March 26, 2009) – Staff One, Inc., a leading provider of HR Outsourcing solutions, today announced a new program that will help small and medium-sized companies optimize their Human Resources costs, stay current with new employment laws and gain access to benefits typically enjoyed by much larger companies.</p>
<p>The <strong>Staff One HR Outsourcing Business Stimulus Program</strong> is designed for businesses with fewer than 750 employees. Participants in the program will receive a wide array of HR services that are typically only available to FORTUNE 500 companies.</p>
<p>For additional details on the program, companies can visit <a href="http://www.staffone.com/stimulus/" target="_blank">www.staffone.com/stimulus</a>. To qualify for the program, companies must contact Staff One prior to April 15, 2009 and become a client by June 1, 2009. Existing clients are not eligible for the program.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">To read the full press release, click </span></strong></span><a href="http://www.staffone.com/media/press_releases/032009_staff_one_stimulus.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">here</span></strong></span></a><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">.</span></strong></span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F03%2F26%2Fstaff-one-offers-incentive-program-to-companies-seeking-hr-outsourcing-services%2F&amp;title=Staff%20One%20Offers%20Incentive%20Program%20to%20Companies%20Seeking%20HR%20Outsourcing%20Services">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/26/staff-one-offers-incentive-program-to-companies-seeking-hr-outsourcing-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Revises Employment Eligibility Verification I-9 Form</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/24/uscis-revises-employment-eligibility-verification-i-9-form/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/24/uscis-revises-employment-eligibility-verification-i-9-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has submitted to the Federal Register an interim final rule that revises the list of documents acceptable for the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, process. The revised form will improve the security of the employment authorization verification process.  Your company will be required to use the revised form for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has submitted to the Federal Register an interim final rule that revises the list of documents acceptable for the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, process. The revised form will improve the security of the employment authorization verification process.  Your company will be required to use the revised form for all new hires and to re-verify any employee with expiring employment authorization beginning on <strong>April 3, 2009</strong>.</p>
<p>The revised Form I-9 reflects changes made to the list of documents acceptable for Form I-9 in accordance with the Department of Homeland Security&#8217;s (DHS) recent interim final rule. The rule furthers DHS&#8217;s ongoing effort to increase the security of the employment authorization verification process.</p>
<p><strong>What is the difference between the revised Form I-9 and the old one?</strong></p>
<p>The biggest difference in the revised Form I-9 is that all documents presented during the verification process must be unexpired. Other than several technical updates, the following documents have been added or removed:</p>
<p><strong>Two documents have been added to List A (Documents that Establish Both Identity and Employment Authorization) on the List of Acceptable Documents:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A temporary I-551 printed notation on a machine-readable immigrant visa in addition to the foreign passport with a temporary I-551 stamp; and</li>
<li>A passport from the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) or the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) with a valid Form I-94 or Form I-94A indicating nonimmigrant admission under the Compact of Free Association Between the United States and the FSM or RMI.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Three documents were removed from List A of the List of Acceptable Documents:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Form I-688, Temporary Resident Card;</li>
<li>Form I-688A, Employment Authorization Card; and</li>
<li>Form I-688B, Employment Authorization Card.</li>
</ul>
<p>Beginning April 3, 2009, your company may only accept documents listed on the List of Acceptable Documents on the revised Form I-9. When an employee must be re-verified because his or her employment authorization has expired, you should ensure that they use the revised Form I-9 with its new List of Acceptable Documents. You cannot re-verify the employee by completing Section 3 &#8211; Updating and Re-verification on a previous version of the Form I-9.</p>
<p><strong>The current edition of Form I-9, dated 06/05/2007, will no longer be valid for use on or after April 3, 2009.  </strong><strong>Employers who continue to use the 06/05/2007 edition of Form I-9 on or after that date may be subject to civil money penalties.</strong></p>
<p>The revised I-9 will be available on the Staff One online forms repository beginning on April 3, 2009.</p>
<p>For more details on employment eligibility verification, you can visit the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website at <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/" target="_blank">www.uscis.gov</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F03%2F24%2Fuscis-revises-employment-eligibility-verification-i-9-form%2F&amp;title=USCIS%20Revises%20Employment%20Eligibility%20Verification%20I-9%20Form">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/24/uscis-revises-employment-eligibility-verification-i-9-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New ADA Amendments Act of 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/11/new-ada-amendments-act-of-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/11/new-ada-amendments-act-of-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADAAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA) became effective January 1, 2009 with significant changes to the ADA&#8217;s definition of a &#8220;disability&#8221;.  The ADAAA retains the basic definition of &#8220;disability&#8221; as an impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.  However, the ADAAA broadens the definition of &#8220;disability&#8221; by expanding the definition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA) became effective January 1, 2009 with significant changes to the ADA&#8217;s definition of a &#8220;disability&#8221;.  The ADAAA retains the basic definition of &#8220;disability&#8221; as an impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.  However, the ADAAA broadens the definition of &#8220;disability&#8221; by expanding the definition of &#8220;major life activities, redefining who is &#8220;regarded as&#8221; having a disability, modifying the regulatory definition of &#8220;substantially limits&#8221;, specifying that &#8220;disability&#8221; includes any impairment that is episodic or in remission if it would substantially limit a major life activity when active; and prohibiting consideration of the ameliorative effects of &#8220;mitigating measures&#8221; when assessing whether an impairment substantially limits a person&#8217;s major life activities with one exception. </p>
<p>The one exception to the rule is the use of &#8220;ordinary eyeglasses or contact lenses&#8221;, when determining whether a person is substantially limited in the major life activity of seeing.  The person&#8217;s vision should be assessed in its corrected state when using eyeglasses or contact lenses.    </p>
<p>The ADAAA also adds a new provision that restricts employers&#8217; use of qualification standards, tests, or other selection criteria that are based on uncorrected vision standards; clarifies that an individual who satisfy only the &#8220;regarded as&#8221; prong of the definition of disability is not entitled to &#8220;reasonable accommodation&#8221;; and modifies the language of the ADA&#8217;s &#8220;General Rule&#8221; that prohibited discrimination against &#8220;a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability of such individual&#8221;.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F03%2F11%2Fnew-ada-amendments-act-of-2008%2F&amp;title=New%20ADA%20Amendments%20Act%20of%202008">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/11/new-ada-amendments-act-of-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Whistleblower Protection</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/01/the-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-whistleblower-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/01/the-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-whistleblower-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus Package]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By NAPEO Staff A little-discussed provision of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) substantially expands whistleblower protections with regard to any activity by entities involved in the stimulus funds. Known as the McCaskill Amendment, Section 1553 extends to those contracting with entities receiving stimulus funds, even when only a portion of the activities are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By NAPEO Staff</em><br />
A little-discussed provision of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) substantially expands whistleblower protections with regard to any activity by entities involved in the stimulus funds. Known as the McCaskill Amendment, Section 1553 extends to those contracting with entities receiving stimulus funds, even when only a portion of the activities are covered by the funds. The protection covers any disclosure by a person to a newly created oversight board, an inspector general, a government agency, a court, or a grand jury if the employee reasonably believes there is gross mismanagement of any agency contract or grant involving the funds, a gross waste of the funds, a substantial danger to public health or safety, an abuse of authority, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation. Protected disclosures will include those made in the ordinary course of an employee&#8217;s duties. The law prohibits waivers or releases of the rights and remedies in any agreement (including any pre-dispute arbitration agreement). Covered employers will be required to post notice of these rights.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F03%2F01%2Fthe-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-whistleblower-protection%2F&amp;title=The%20American%20Recovery%20and%20Reinvestment%20Act%20of%202009%3A%20Whistleblower%20Protection">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/03/01/the-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-whistleblower-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: COBRA Premium Subsidy</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/25/the-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-cobra-premium-subsidy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/25/the-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-cobra-premium-subsidy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus Package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Among many other provisions designed to encourage economic recovery, Title III of ARRA expands the federal Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) Continuation Coverage to provide a federal subsidy toward an eligible worker&#8217;s COBRA premium. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Among many other provisions designed to encourage economic recovery, Title III of ARRA expands the federal Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) Continuation Coverage to provide a federal subsidy toward an eligible worker&#8217;s COBRA premium.</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The provisions in ARRA providing this subsidy are effective as of the date of the President&#8217;s signing. <strong></strong></li>
<li>Eligible workers may receive a 65% subsidy toward their COBRA continuation premium for up to 9 months. Previously any individual enrolling in COBRA was responsible for 100% of the cost of the coverage, plus a 2% administrative fee.</li>
<li>The Treasury Dept. will administer the subsidy, providing employers or health plans, if they administer COBRA benefits, with a credit against payroll taxes for the cost of the subsidy.</li>
<li>The subsidy terminates the date the individual becomes eligible for any new employer-sponsored health plan or Medicare coverage.</li>
<li>Individuals involuntarily terminated from employment between September 1, 2008 and December 1, 2009 and who have annual incomes less than $125k (single) or $250k (joint filers) for the taxable year in which the subsidy is received are eligible for the COBRA assistance, along with their families.</li>
<li>Qualified individuals who initially decline COBRA coverage prior to ARRA will be given an additional 60 days after they receive notice of the special election period to elect to receive the subsidy.</li>
<li>The special election opportunity is also available to a qualified beneficiary who elected COBRA coverage but who is no longer enrolled on the date of enactment of ARRA, for example, because the beneficiary was unable to continue paying the premium.</li>
<li>COBRA notices must include information on the availability of the premium assistance and must be provided to all individuals who terminated employment during the applicable time period, not just individuals who were involuntarily terminated.</li>
</ul>
<p>The Department of Labor has 30 days after the enactment of ARRA to issue model notices for use by employers.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F02%2F25%2Fthe-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-cobra-premium-subsidy%2F&amp;title=The%20American%20Recovery%20and%20Reinvestment%20Act%20of%202009%3A%20COBRA%20Premium%20Subsidy">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/25/the-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-cobra-premium-subsidy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New FMLA</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/20/the-new-fmla-january-16-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/20/the-new-fmla-january-16-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Effective January 16, 2009, the new FMLA rules will have an impact on companies in PEO relationships. In addition to other changes, these rules make FMLA compliance optional to employer with less than 50 employees.  At a high level, the new rules require that HR professionals master 10 key changes to the regulation: Military caregiver [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Effective January 16, 2009, the new FMLA rules will have an impact on companies in PEO relationships. In addition to other changes, these rules make FMLA compliance optional to employer with less than 50 employees.  At a high level, the new rules require that HR professionals master 10 key changes to the regulation:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Military caregiver leave:</strong> Implements the requirement to expand FMLA protections for family members caring for a covered service member with a serious injury or illness incurred while on active duty. These family members are able to take up to 26 workweeks of leave in a 12-month period.</li>
<li><strong>Leave for &#8220;qualifying exigencies&#8221; for families of National Guard and Reserve members:</strong> The law allows families of National Guard and Reserve personnel on active duty to take FMLA job-protected leave to manage their affairs &#8211; &#8220;qualifying exigencies.&#8221; The rules define &#8220;qualifying exigencies&#8221; as situations involving: 1) short-notice deployment, 2) military events and related activities, 3) childcare and school activities, 4) financial and legal arrangements, 5) counseling, 6) rest and recuperation, 7) post-deployment activities and 8 ) additional activities where the employer and employee agree to the leave.</li>
<li><strong>New employer notice obligations:</strong> The final rules consolidate all employer notice requirements into a &#8220;one-stop&#8221; section of the regulations to clear up some conflicting provisions and time periods. Further, they clarify and strengthen employer notice requirements so employers can better inform employees about their FMLA rights and obligations, and allow for a smoother exchange of information between employers and employees.</li>
<li><strong>New employee notice rights:</strong> The final rules modify the current provision that had been interpreted to allow some employees to notify their employers of their need for FMLA leave up to two full business days after an absence, even if they could provide notice sooner. Under the final rules, the employee must follow the employer&#8217;s normal and customary call-in procedures, unless there are unusual circumstances.</li>
<li><strong>New medical certification process:</strong> The final rules recognize the advent of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the applicability of HIPAA&#8217;s medical privacy rule to communications between employers and employees&#8217; health care providers. Responding to concerns about medical privacy, the rules add a requirement that limits who may contact the health care provider and bans an employee&#8217;s direct supervisor from making the contact.</li>
<li><strong>Clarification of waivers of rights:</strong> The DOL has finalized its longstanding position that employees may voluntarily settle their FMLA claims without court or departmental approval. However, prospective waivers of FMLA rights will continue to be prohibited.</li>
<li><strong>Definition of &#8220;serious health condition&#8221;:</strong> While the rules retain individual definitions of &#8220;serious health condition,&#8221; they add guidance on some regulatory matters. If an employee is taking leave involving more than three consecutive calendar days of incapacity plus two visits to a health care provider, the two visits must occur within 30 days of the period of incapacity. The rules define &#8220;periodic visits to a health care provider&#8221; for chronic serious health conditions as at least two visits to a health care provider per year.</li>
<li><strong>Clarification of light-duty FMLA rules:</strong> At least two courts have held that an employee uses up his or her 12-week FMLA leave while on a &#8220;light-duty&#8221; assignment. Under the final rules, time spent in light-duty work does not count against an employee&#8217;s FMLA leave entitlement, and the employee&#8217;s right to job restoration is held in abeyance during the light-duty period. If an employee is voluntarily doing light-duty work, he or she is not on FMLA leave.</li>
<li><strong>Application of FMLA leave to awarding perfect attendance awards:</strong> The final rules change how perfect attendance awards are treated to allow employers to deny a &#8220;perfect attendance&#8221; award to an employee who does not have perfect attendance because he or she took FMLA leave-but only if the employer treats employees taking non-FMLA leave in an identical way.</li>
<li><strong>Clarification of &#8220;leave stacking&#8221; rules:</strong> The updated rule contains technical changes to be consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide Inc. The court ruled that the regulation&#8217;s so-called &#8220;categorical&#8221; penalty (requiring an employer to provide 12 additional weeks of FMLA-protected leave after the employee had already taken 30 weeks of leave ) was inconsistent with the statutory limit of only 12 weeks of FMLA leave and contrary to the law&#8217;s remedial requirement that an employee demonstrate individual harm. The new rule removes these penalties and clarifies that if an employee suffers individual harm because the employer did not follow the notification rules, the employer may be liable.</li>
</ul>
<p>The new employer notice obligation will be the most critical to follow.  There are new FMLA forms and deadlines for the notification.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F02%2F20%2Fthe-new-fmla-january-16-2009%2F&amp;title=The%20New%20FMLA">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/20/the-new-fmla-january-16-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Tax Relief Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/19/the-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-tax-relief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/19/the-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-tax-relief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDonald Hopkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus Package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbits.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of programs were included in the Act, which focus on providing tax relief to both individuals and businesses. Some of the more notable provisions are: &#8220;Making Work Pay&#8221; Tax Credit The Making Work Pay credit, which is available in 2009 and 2010, is worth up to $400 for an individual and $800 for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A number of programs were included in the Act, which focus on providing tax relief to both individuals and businesses. Some of the more notable provisions are:</p>
<p><strong><em>&#8220;Making Work Pay&#8221; Tax Credit</em></strong><br />
The Making Work Pay credit, which is available in 2009 and 2010, is worth up to $400 for an individual and $800 for spouses filing jointly. This credit begins to phase out for taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes in excess of $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for married couples filing jointly. This credit can either be claimed on tax returns or by reducing the amount of taxes that are withheld from paychecks.</p>
<p><strong><em>&#8220;American Opportunity&#8221; Education Credit</em></strong><br />
This credit renames and expands the HOPE education credit. It allows a taxpayer to receive a credit of 100% for the first $2,000 in qualifying tuition and related expenses, and 25% for the second $2,000 of such expenses, for a maximum of $2,500. This credit is subject to a phase-out for individual taxpayers with an adjusted gross income in excess of $80,000 or $160,000 for married couples filing jointly.</p>
<p><strong><em>Alternative Minimum Tax Patch</em></strong><br />
The Alternative Minimum Tax exemption is increased to $46,700 for individuals and $70,950 for married couples filing jointly, and allows personal credits against the Alternative Minimum Tax. This patch protects an estimated 26 million taxpayers from becoming subject to the AMT.</p>
<p><strong><em>Above the Line Deduction for Automobiles</em></strong><br />
This is a new tax deduction for state and local sales tax paid on the purchase of new cars, from the effective date of the Act, February 17, 2009, through December 31, 2009. This deduction begins to phase out for taxpayers earning $125,000 per year for individuals and $250,000 for joint returns.</p>
<p><strong><em>Extension of Bonus Depreciation</em></strong><br />
The bonus depreciation rules, which were set to expire after 2008, are extended for one year. The extended rule allows a 50% bonus depreciation for certain property placed in service by businesses in 2009, allowing businesses to deduct from their taxes 50% of the value of that property in addition to amounts that may otherwise be claimed under depreciation rules, after the item&#8217;s value is adjusted to account for the bonus depreciation.</p>
<p><strong><em>Small Business Capital Gains</em></strong><br />
The law allows for a 75% exclusion for individuals on the gain from the sale of qualified stock held for more than five years. This applies to stock issued between February 17, 2009 and January 1, 2011. This exclusion is limited to individual investments and not the investments of a corporation.</p>
<p><strong><em>Five-Year Carryback of Net Operating Losses</em></strong><br />
Businesses are allowed to &#8220;carryback&#8221; certain operating losses for up to five years, as opposed to the two year limitation previously allowed. Once a business opts to use the extended period, it becomes irrevocable.</p>
<p><strong><em>Advanced Energy Investment Credit</em></strong><br />
A 30% investment tax credit is established for manufacturing advanced energy property, such as facilities that manufacture components for the production of renewable energy, energy conservation and other green technologies.</p>
<p><strong><em>Non-Business &amp; Residential Energy Property Credit</em></strong><br />
The tax credit for non-business energy property is increased to 30%. This credit may be claimed against expenses for certain energy-efficient improvements to existing homes, such as new furnaces, energy-efficient windows and doors, or insulation. To qualify, such expenses must occur in 2009.</p>
<p><strong><em>New Markets Tax Credit</em></strong><br />
The dollars available for the New Markets Tax Credit increase to $5 billion for 2008 and 2009.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F02%2F19%2Fthe-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-tax-relief%2F&amp;title=The%20American%20Recovery%20and%20Reinvestment%20Act%20of%202009%3A%20Tax%20Relief%20Overview">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/19/the-american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009-tax-relief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Delays Requirement to Use Revised I-9 Form</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/17/us-delays-requirement-to-use-revised-i-9-form/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/17/us-delays-requirement-to-use-revised-i-9-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff One</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staffone.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.10.35/blog/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By SHRM Online staff Officials with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) have delayed until April 3, 2009, a requirement that employers must use a revised version of the employment eligibility verification form–known as the I-9 form. According to an interim rule published in December 2008, employers were supposed to begin using the revised [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By SHRM Online staff </em><br />
Officials with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) have delayed until April 3, 2009, a requirement that employers must use a revised version of the employment eligibility verification form–known as the I-9 form. According to an <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-29874.htm" target="_Blank">interim rule</a> published in December 2008, employers were supposed to begin using the revised verification form on Feb. 2, 2009. However, when President Obama took office, the White House issued a directive to all federal agencies asking them to review any regulations introduced by the Bush administration that had not taken effect before Jan. 20, 2009.</p>
<p>USCIS officials stated that the 60-day delay should provide adequate time to complete a full review of the new form and employment verification requirements. A notice announcing the delay was set to appear in the Federal Register. In addition, the USCIS will reopen the public comment period on the new rule for 30 days, until March 4, 2009. Employers must complete a Form I-9 for all newly hired employees to verify their identity and authorization to work in the United States. The interim final rule as published would have revised the types of acceptable identity and employment authorization documents employers can accept from new hires. </p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hrbits.com%2F2009%2F02%2F17%2Fus-delays-requirement-to-use-revised-i-9-form%2F&amp;title=USCIS%20Delays%20Requirement%20to%20Use%20Revised%20I-9%20Form">SHARE</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrbits.com/2009/02/17/us-delays-requirement-to-use-revised-i-9-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

