http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/ebsa/EBSA20100056.htm

The federal Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration establishes a final rule, effective Jan. 14, 2010, giving employers that have employee benefit plans with fewer than 100 participants a seven business day safe harbor period to deposit employee contributions to plans. Employers with retirement or welfare benefit plans subject to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 must deposit employee contributions to plans on the earliest date that contributions reasonably can be separated from other employer assets. The safe harbor rule does not change ERISA’s requirement that employee contributions to welfare benefit plans must be made no later than 90 days after receipt, and employee contributions to retirement plans must be made by the 15th business day of the month following the month in which contributions are received.

President Obama, on Dec. 19, 2009, signed the Fiscal Year 2010 Defense Appropriations Act which includes amendments to the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 that provided health care premium assistance for certain individuals. ARRA revised the federal Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 to require employers with COBRA-covered group health plans to pay 65 percent of health care premiums for up to nine months for assistance eligible individuals who lose health care coverage due to employees’ involuntary employment termination between Sept. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2009. The new law expands the duration of the 65 percent premium assistance from nine to 15 months, and extends premium assistance to individuals who lose health care coverage due to employees’ involuntary employment termination between Sept. 1, 2008, and Feb. 28, 2010.

by National Association of State Workforce Agencies

NASWA has released a survey of the state unemployment trust fund solvency and tax rates. The survey’s findings underscores the significant impact that the current economic recession is having on Unemployment Insurance (UI) costs for all employers.

A total of 24 states will increase their taxable wage base in 2010. Of these 24 states, seven states (AR, FL, IN, NH, TN, VT and WV) have enacted legislation to increase the state’s “taxable wage base,” the level of wages subject to a payroll tax on employers. The remaining 17 state programs (AK, HI, ID, IA, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NC, ND, OK, OR, UT, VI, WA and WY) index their taxable wage bases to the state’s average wages and will automatically increase their taxable wage bases for 2010.

Of the 51 state programs surveyed, 28 states (AK, AL, AZ, CO, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KS, MA, MD, ME, MN, MT, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NY, OH, OR, PA, PR, VA, VT, WI and WY) indicated the tax schedule in their state will see an increase in 2010 compared to 2009. The majority of these increases will be automatic; adjustments often triggered by low levels of reserve funds in the state accounts used to finance unemployment benefits. While it is normal for states to recalculate tax rates each year, the magnitude of these rate increases for most states is unusual.

In addition, ten states (CA, CT, DE, KY, MI, MO, NC, RI, SC and TN) indicated their tax rate schedules were already at the highest tier, which would prevent them from automatically increasing in 2010. Consequently, the state legislatures would need to enact changes in state laws – either increasing the tax rates by changing tax rate schedules or increasing the state taxable wage bases.

Six of the 51 state programs surveyed (AR, CA, CT, FL, HI and MA) indicated they will automatically increase their tax rates due to a solvency tax already in state law. The majority of these solvency taxes also activate when states’ trust fund balances fall below specified levels.

Of the 51 state programs surveyed, 35 states estimated the level of UI tax revenue collected in 2010 would surpass the level collected in 2009; with a median projected increase of 27.5%. The range of these projected increases was 2.5% to 600%.

More information can be found at www.workforceatm.org

by MHA

Three annual notices must be given to all plan participants no later than 30 days prior to the beginning of each plan year. For calendar year plans, this deadline is Dec. 1. The notices listed below are each separate legal requirements, but a plan that is subject to more than one notice may use a single notice to satisfy the requirement.

• Safe Harbor Notice: A plan that uses a safe harbor method to avoid annual ADP/ACP nondiscrimination testing must provide a safe harbor notice to each participant and employee who is eligible to participate in the plan. The types of safe harbors includes dollar-for-dollar matching on the first 3 percent of deferrals and 50 percent on the next 2 percent, a 3 percent non-elective contribution, or the new qualified automatic contribution arrangement (QACA) created by the Pension Protection Act.
• Qualified Default Investment Alternative (QDIA) Notice: A plan that provides for participant-directed investments and has a default investment option must provide a QDIA notice if the plan fiduciaries are seeking protection from lawsuits by plan participants who are defaulted into this option.
• Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangement (EACA): A plan that allows for automatic enrollment but includes a provision allowing participants to opt out and withdraw deferrals within the first 90 days after being enrolled must provide a notice describing the terms of the EACA.

Finally, defined contribution plans that implemented a waiver of the required minimum distributions for 2009 are reminded that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued sample amendments, and transition relief for certain actions taken on or before Nov. 30, 2009. Beginning Dec. 1, 2009, each plan must have implemented a policy regarding the handling of minimum distributions, including adoption of plan amendments which is required at the end of the 2011 plan year.

From Employee Benefit News

Employer and employees have a new resource that can be used to help battle obesity in the workforce. Earlier this year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention unveiled LEANworks!, a web site full of free resources for employers to develop wellness programs to address obesity. The site, www.cdc.gov/LEANWorks, includes research reports, case studies, ROI information, and an obesity calculator. It features how -to information about assessing the needs of the workforce, developing an effective program, setting goals, budgeting, and strategies for implementing and promoting the program.

By Kaiser Family Foundation

Achieving comprehensive health reform has emerged as a leading priority of the President and Congress. President Obama has outlined eight principles for health reform, seeking to address not only the 45 million people who lack health insurance, but also rising health care costs and lack of quality. In Congress, a number of comprehensive reform proposals have been announced as the debate proceeds over how to overhaul the health care system.

This interactive side-by-side compares the leading comprehensive reform proposals across a number of key characteristics and plan components. Included in this side-by-side are proposals for moving toward universal coverage that have been put forward by the President and Members of Congress. In an effort to capture the most important proposals, we have included those that have been formally introduced as legislation as well as those that have been offered as draft proposals or as policy options. It will be regularly updated to reflect changes in the proposals and to incorporate major new proposals as they are announced. This side-by-side offers a summary of the major components of these proposals; detailed descriptions of provisions relating to the Medicare and Medicaid programs can be found online.

Click here to access the comparison

On October 9, 2008, President Bush signed “Michelle’s Law” (H.R. 2851) designed to ensure that dependent college students who take a medically necessary leave of absence do not lose health insurance coverage.

The law was named after Michelle Morse, a college student who suffered from cancer and continued her course load, against the advice of doctors, in order to remain covered by health insurance.

Michelle’s law provides that a group health plan may not terminate a college student’s health coverage simply because the child takes a medically necessary leave of absence from school or changes to part-time status. The leave of absence must:

• Be medically necessary;
• Commence while the child is suffering from a serious illness or injury; and
• Cause the child to lose coverage under the plan.

To take advantage of the extension, the child must have been enrolled in the group health plan on the basis of being a student at a post-secondary educational institution immediately before the first day of the leave. Coverage must extend for one year after the first day of the leave (or, if earlier, the date coverage would otherwise terminate under the plan). The student on leave is entitled to the same benefits as if they had not taken a leave. If coverage changes during the student’s leave, then this new law applies in the same manner as the prior coverage.

Physician’s Certification and Notice

The group health plan must receive written certification by the child’s treating physician stating the child is suffering from a serious illness or injury, and the leave (or change of enrollment) is medically necessary. In addition, when sending any notice describing the plan’s student certification requirements for coverage, the plan also must include a description of the terms for continued coverage under this law.

Michelle’s Law is effective for plan years beginning on or after October 9, 2009.

Learn more at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h2851enr.txt.pdf

From Kaiser Family Foundation

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance rose to $13,375 annually for family coverage this year—with employees on average paying $3,515 and employers paying $9,860, according to the benchmark 2009 Employer Health Benefits Survey released today by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research & Educational Trust (HRET).

Family premiums rose about 5 percent this year, which is much more than general inflation (which fell 0.7 percent during the same period, mostly due to falling energy prices). Workers wages went up 3.1 percent during the same period. Since 1999, premiums have gone up a total of 131 percent, far more rapidly than workers’ wages (up 38 percent since 1999) or inflation (up 28 percent since 1999). For the past few years, the annual rise in premiums has been more moderate than the double-digit growth experienced earlier this decade.

Read the full press release at: http://www.kff.org/insurance/ehbs091509nr.cfm 
Read the complete survey analysis at: http://ehbs.kff.org/

The $856 billion health care reform proposal released Sept. 16 by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) does not require that employers provide health care benefits. Starting in 2013, however, companies with more than 50 workers that do not offer health coverage would have to reimburse the federal government for each full-time employee receiving a health care affordability tax credit in the new health care exchanges designed to help individuals find affordable policies.

While there is no provision to prevent employers from dropping coverage, committee staff members said most employers believe that providing coverage gives them a competitive advantage in attracting and retaining the best workers.

Under the proposal, businesses with fewer than 25 employees and average annual wages of less than $40,000 could receive credits up to 35 percent for tax years 2011 and 2012. Annual contributions to flexible spending accounts would be limited to $2,000 and FSA funds could not be used to buy over-the-counter medications without a prescription.

The Senate Finance Committee is scheduled to start debating the proposal on Sept. 22.

For a copy of the legislation, click here.

From MHA

On September 5, 2009, President Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner announced a set of new initiatives designed to encourage retirement savings. The new guidance expands opportunities for automatic enrollment in 401(k) and other retirement plans and enables employees to contribute amounts representing unused vacation or similar leave time to retirement plans (including 401(k) plans). The guidance also updates the IRS’s model rollover notice. The IRS also issued Special Edition Newsletters of both Employee Plans News and Retirement News for Employers with information about the changes.

Automatic Enrollment

• Revenue Ruling 2009-30. This ruling addresses automatic enrollment in 401(k) plans that contain a feature under which employee deferrals to the plan automatically increases each year without an affirmative election by the employee. The ruling describes two situations-one involving a basic automatic contribution arrangement and the other involving an arrangement intended to satisfy the requirements for a qualified automatic contribution arrangement (QACA) and an eligible automatic contribution arrangement (EACA).

Click here to view Revenue Ruling 2009-30

• Notice 2009-65. This notice contains two sample plan amendments to facilitate the use of automatic enrollment. The pre-approved automatic enrollment language will allow employers to amend their plans to adopt automatic enrollment more quickly-and without the need for case-by-case approval from the IRS. The notice states that plans are not required to adopt either amendment verbatim.

Click here to view Notice 2009-65

• Notice 2009-66 and Notice 2009-67. These companion notices provide guidance and a sample amendment, respectively, for including an automatic contribution arrangement in SIMPLE IRA plans.

Click here to view Notice 2009-66 or Click here to view Notice 2009-67

Unused Vacation or Other Similar Leave

• Revenue Ruling 2009-31. This guidance illustrates two situations in which the dollar equivalent of unused paid time off (PTO) can be contributed to an employer’s profit-sharing plan without adversely affecting the plan’s qualified status.

Revenue Ruling 2009-32. This guidance addresses similar contributions at termination of employment.

Click here to view Revenue Ruling 2009-32

Updated Model Rollover Notice under Code Section 402(f)

• Notice 2009-68. This notice simplifies the presentation of an employee’s options when receiving an eligible rollover distribution. It provides a rollover roadmap that satisfies the required notice that must be provided to employees taking their retirement assets. The notice also reflects law changes (such as information on a distribution from a designated Roth account under an employer plan) and explains rules that apply in special situations (such as when a distribution is made to a surviving spouse or other beneficiary).

Click here to view Notice 2009-68