Welcome to HR Bits!

The landscape of HR and employment law is constantly changing. Staff One's professionals will
work to provide you with timely information on issues that matter. We welcome your comments.

This content, which was specially aggregated by Staff One, Inc., is not designed to render legal
advice or legal opinion. Such advice may be given only by a licensed, practicing attorney, and
only when related to actual fact situations. The material contained herein is intended to be
informational and not specific to a particular event or activity at a specific client worksite.

Archive for March, 2010

A Look at the Health Care Bill

by The Associated Press

Here are some of the features of the legislation.

HOW MANY COVERED: 32 million uninsured. Major coverage expansion begins in 2014. When fully phased in, 94 percent of eligible non-elderly Americans would have coverage, compared with 83 percent today.

COST: $938 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

INSURANCE MANDATE: Almost everyone is required to be insured or else pay a fine, which takes effect in 2014. There is an exemption for low-income people.

INSURANCE MARKET REFORMS: Starting this year, insurers would be forbidden from placing lifetime dollar limits on policies, from denying coverage to children because of pre-existing conditions, and from canceling policies because someone gets sick. Parents would be able to keep older kids on their coverage up to age 26. A new high-risk pool would offer coverage to uninsured people with medical problems until 2014, when the coverage expansion goes into high gear. Major consumer safeguards would also take effect in 2014. Insurers would be prohibited from denying coverage to people with medical problems or charging them more. Insurers could not charge women more.

MEDICAID: Expands the federal-state Medicaid insurance program for the poor to cover people with incomes up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level, $29,327 a year for a family of four. Childless adults would be covered for the first time, starting in 2014. The federal government would pay 100 percent of costs for covering newly eligible individuals through 2016.

If the Senate approves a package of changes this week, a special deal that would have given Nebraska 100 percent federal financing for newly eligible Medicaid recipients in perpetuity would be eliminated. A different, one-time deal negotiated by Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu for her state, Louisiana, worth as much as $300 million, remains.

TAXES: To make up for the lost revenue, the bill applies an increased Medicare payroll tax to the investment income and to the wages of individuals making more than $200,000, or married couples above $250,000. The tax on investment income would be 3.8 percent. If the Senate follows through, it would impose a 40 percent tax on high-cost insurance plans above the threshold of $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for families. The tax would go into effect in 2018.

PRESCRIPTION DRUGS: Gradually closes the “doughnut hole” coverage gap in the Medicare prescription drug benefit that seniors fall into once they have spent $2,830. Seniors who hit the gap this year will receive a $250 rebate. Beginning in 2011, seniors in the gap receive a discount on brand name drugs, initially 50 percent off. When the gap is completely eliminated in 2020, seniors will still be responsible for 25 percent of the cost of their medications until Medicare’s catastrophic coverage kicks in.

EMPLOYER RESPONSIBILITY: Employers are hit with a fee if the government subsidizes their workers’ coverage. The $2,000-per-employee fee would be assessed on the company’s entire work force, minus an allowance. Companies with 50 or fewer workers are exempt from the requirement.

SUBSIDIES: The aid is available on a sliding scale for households making up to four times the federal poverty level, $88,200 for a family of four. Premiums for a family of four making $44,000 would be capped at around 6 percent of income.

HOW YOU CHOOSE YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE: Small businesses, the self-employed and the uninsured could pick a plan offered through new state-based purchasing pools called exchanges, opening for business in 2014. The exchanges would offer the same kind of purchasing power that employees of big companies benefit from. People working for medium-to-large firms would not see major changes. But if they lose their jobs or strike out on their own, they may be eligible for subsidized coverage through the exchange.

GOVERNMENT-RUN PLAN: No government-run insurance plan. People purchasing coverage through the new insurance exchanges would have the option of signing up for national plans overseen by the federal office that manages the health plans available to members of Congress. Those plans would be private, but one would have to be nonprofit.

ABORTION: The bill tries to maintain a strict separation between taxpayer dollars and private premiums that would pay for abortion coverage. No health plan would be required to offer coverage for abortion. In plans that do cover abortion, policyholders would have to pay for it separately, and that money would have to be kept in a separate account from taxpayer money. States could ban abortion coverage in plans offered through the exchange. Exceptions would be made for cases of rape, incest and danger to the life of the mother.

GOP HEALTH CARE SUMMIT IDEAS: Following a bipartisan health care summit last month, Obama announced he was open to incorporating several Republican ideas into his legislation. But two of the principle ones — hiring investigators to pose as patients and search for fraud at hospitals and increasing spending for medical malpractice reform initiatives — did not make it into the legislation. The legislation incorporates only one, an increase in payments to primary care physicians under Medicaid, an idea mentioned by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.

Alexandria, Va. (March 12, 2010) — Wisconsin’s small business owners and other small employers who have come to depend on the outsourced employment solutions of professional employer organizations (PEOs) for payroll, benefits, risk management and human resources are guaranteed tax credits and other economic incentives remain with them under passage of Senate Bill 504 this session.

The bill was unanimously passed by both the Senate and Assembly and updates the provisions of Wisconsin Act 189, which established the original regulatory framework for PEOs. The PEO market has grown substantially since passage of the statute in Wisconsin in 2007. The average PEO serves approximately 200 business clients and 4,000 workers.

“PEOs assume a wide variety of significant employer responsibilities for these small employers, including the delivery of risk management services, said Michael Gotzler of Madison headquartered QTI Human Resources Inc. “They also pay the wages of worksite employees, manage payroll tax payments and compliance, improve compliance with federal and state labor regulations, share human resource management best practices and sponsor many employee benefit programs including health care and retirement savings plans. Ironically it is this shared or co-employment arrangement that lead to the need to clarify that tax credits and economic benefits offered by local government belong to the client and not the PEO.”

Melinda Heinritz, executive director of the Wisconsin Historical Foundation and long-time PEO client of QTI Human Resources, explained, “We rely heavily on the services and expertise of QTI to help us effectively navigate all aspects of human resources management. Doing so allows the Foundation to focus time and energy on fulfilling our mission and executing our core competencies in marketing, membership and fundraising on behalf of the Wisconsin Historical Society.”

Gotzler worked with the PEO industry’s trade association, the National Association of Professional Employer Organizations (NAPEO) and the Department of Regulation and Licensing to ensure the original intent of the act provided a layer of safeguards and oversight for small business owners and their employers in PEO outsourcing arrangement. Under the original law, PEOs were wrongly classified as temporary help agencies leading to some of the administrative confusion.

As in 34 other states, PEOs in Wisconsin are required to maintain minimum financial standards, file annual audited financial statements, and register with the Department of Regulation and Licensing.

NAPEO says the concept of regulating PEOs is not a new one. The provisions contained in this bill are based on model legislation. “Over the past 25 years, these standards and requirements have been tested and refined to strike the balance of the need for responsible regulation,” said Milan Yager, president and CEO of NAPEO. NAPEO represents the $68 billion industry, which has experienced double digit growth for the past five years.

The bill was sponsored by Senator Bob Wirch and led through the Assembly by Representative Steve Hilgenberg, who introduced companion legislation Assembly Bill 716.

About NAPEO

As the recognized Voice of the PEO Industry,® NAPEO represents nearly 400 professional employer organizations (PEOs). The PEO industry has matured to $68 billion with double digit growth annually since 2004. As NAPEO enters its 25th year, the potential market remains promising with high client retention rates, a projected increase in revenues for 2010, and the current untapped market now serving 300,000 business owners and 2 to 3 million workers. PEOs allow clients to “reduce costs and free up time to devote to revenue generating activities, improvements that can be instrumental to gaining competitive advantage,” according to research by the Society of Human Resource Management Foundation. To learn more about how PEOs contribute to small businesses’ success, visit the NAPEO Web site at www.napeo.org.

About Staff One

Founded in 1988, Staff One is a leader in the Human Resources
Outsourcing industry with an ESAC accredited and bonded PEO service
offering. The Company is a preferred provider of outsourced human resources
management services that include, benefits and payroll administration,
health and workers compensation insurance programs, personnel records
management, employer liability management, employee performance management
and employee training and development services to small and medium-sized
businesses. Staff One is headquartered in Durant, Okla., with offices
in Dallas, Little Rock, Ark., Nashville, Tenn., and Tulsa, Okla. For
more information, visit www.staffone.com.

President Obama on March 18 signed the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (H.R. 2847), which includes a tax credit for certain new hires retained by employers and a Social Security payroll tax exemption for such new hires. Under the HIRE Act, employers generally can take a tax credit of up to $1,000 for each new hire who begins employment between Feb. 4 and Dec. 31, 2010, and attests to being unemployed for at least 60 days prior to such employment (or having worked less than a total of 40 hours during the 60-day period). These employees must be employed for at least 52 consecutive weeks and earn wages during the last 26 weeks of such period equal to at least 80 percent of wages paid during the first 26 weeks. Employers cannot replace employees with these new hires unless the employees have left employment voluntarily or for cause. In addition, employers can exempt their share of Social Security payroll taxes in 2010 for these new hires.

More information can be found at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.2847:

Online social media, such as social networking websites or blogs, can be highly effective business tools for sharing ideas and exchanging information. They also can present problems for employers when dealing with how employees use such media in and outside of workplaces. Improper use of social media by employees can include disclosing employer sensitive or proprietary information over social media or using social media via employers’ electronic communication systems to engage in illegal or fraudulent activities. To help reduce liability for improper use of social media by employees, employers should adopt and implement social media and electronic communications policies to set guidelines for employee use of online social media.

Recent Staff One Presentation Developing an Effective Social Media Policy

The NCAA tournament is just around the corner and offices are abuzz with friendly banter and cries of team loyalty. Along with plenty of excitement and newfound bragging rights among fellow colleagues, March Madness brings forth a torrid fear of lost productivity in the workplace. Though accurate numbers are incredibly difficult to pinpoint in such instances, outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, estimated in a 2008 press release that lost productivity during the tournament could cost businesses an estimated 1.7 billion every year. While these numbers are seen only as an estimate and in some opinions as a heavily aggrandized estimate, it would be foolish to think that there is not a significant impact on time and productivity for the duration of the tournament.

While an employer’s first reaction may be to try and limit March Madness related activities in the workplace, there are definitely a few things to consider before taking any action against tournament involvement. First, denial of participation could be seen by employees as overbearing and in opposition to a fun work environment. Employee morale is crucial for productivity, and would therefore seem counterintuitive for employers hoping to retain a high level of productivity to discourage participation in an activity considered somewhat of a sports holiday. Instead of discouraging involvement and risking a discontented office, consider using March Madness to your advantage. There are many different ways an employer or manager could use the NCAA tournament as a way to improve employee morale and create a stronger sense of camaraderie throughout the workplace:

1. Create an online, office-wide bracket.
Creating a bracket on a website such as ESPN.com or Yahoo! Sports would eliminate the need to create, hand out and fill in paper brackets. Encourage people to participate only if they would like, and if the employees would like to have a buy-in for competitive purposes, we suggest the money go towards a charity or non-profit organization of the winner’s choice.

2. Offer small, fun and/or personalized prizes for top placers.
An already stated prize would not only encourage friendly competition and participation, it would also help to discourage against illegal gambling in the workplace. Some example of appropriate prizes may include gift certificates, a favorite team souvenir, or perhaps a meal on a supervisor’s tab.

3. Offer flexible hours and dress code allowances when appropriate.
A possible solution to the distraction of an early evening game could be a flexible work week. Also, since Fridays are often considered a more causal day in the workplace, employees could be encouraged to wear a tie, jersey or even socks to show where their hopes and loyalties lay within the tournament.

4. Encourage watching the tournament as a group
Many workplaces allot for short breaks throughout the day. Encourage employees to gather to the TV in the break room (or at single designated computer as to not take up too much bandwidth) during those times. One could even promote a potluck lunch, catering or group gatherings after work to watch the game together.

5. Designate times to stay involved and keep the competition alive.
A bi-weekly e-mail or short announcement at the end of an informal meeting discussing up-to-date results would help to discourage employees from constantly tracking brackets while at work and would also help the manager or supervisor to stay involved.

While this list is not at all exhaustive, these are a few simple ways to take what is consistently seen as a drag on productivity and turn it into a way to promote a healthier and more enjoyable work environment. For more information or any questions, contact Staff One at 1-800-771-7823 or visit www.staffone.com.
Founded in 1988, Staff One is a leading Human Resources Outsourcing firm with an ESAC accredited and bonded PEO service offering. Staff One operates as a full-service human resources department and delivers a comprehensive range of solutions that provides our clients with a level of support and value previously only available at much larger companies. By aggregating the buying power of hundreds of firms, we provide premium benefits, risk management, compliance management, payroll outsourcing, tax administration and strategic HR services to our customers, so they can focus on growing their core business.

On March 2, 2010, the U.S. Senate passed H.R. 4691, the Temporary Extension Act of 2010 by a vote of 78-19.  This Senate action follows House passage of H.R. 4691 on February 25, 2010.  The President immediately signed this bill into law on March 2, 2010.

The Temporary Extension Act:

  1. Extends the COBRA subsidy program that was enacted under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and
  2. Extends unemployment benefits through April 5, 2010.

COBRA

The law’s COBRA provisions:

  • Extend the eligibility period for the 15-month 65 percent premium subsidy to those involuntarily terminated from March 1 through March 31, 2010.
  • Allow employees to receive the subsidy if they first lost group coverage due to a reduction in hours and then were terminated after enactment of the bill.

Unemployment Insurance

The law’s unemployment insurance benefit provisions:

  • Extend the period during which individuals may file applications for Federal Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) from the current end date of February 28, 2010 to April 5, 2010 and the period during which individuals may claim and be paid EUC is extended from July 31, 2010 to September 4, 2010.
  • Extend the period during which individuals may qualify for the Federal Additional Compensation (FAC), the extra $25 weekly benefit amount on state and federal unemployment compensation, from the current end date of February 28, 2010 to April 5, 2010 with weekly payment provided during the phase out period for weeks ending October 5, 2010 instead of August 31, 2010.
  • Extend the period during which 100% federal reimbursement for weeks of regular federal extended benefit payments to April 5, 2010, with the state option to continue the extended period from July 31, 2010 to September 4, 2010.

Additional Extension

These “short-term” extensions of the COBRA subsidy and unemployment benefits are intended to give Congress more time to consider legislation to extend these programs through 2010.  Under H.R. 4213, a bill the Senate is currently debating, both the COBRA subsidy program and unemployment benefits would be extended through December 31, 2010.